Some people like to work in teams. Others prefer to work alone. which do you prefer?
It seems that the modern world is forming based on relationships and interdisciplinary science so that most people need to cooperate with others in different fields. Despite the fact that some people prefer to work alone, in my opinion, work as a team has more advantages which are referred to three of them.
Firstly, in a team, tasks are divided among subgroups with different skills and knowledge. In big projects like computer science research, nobody can complete the project alone because such projects are formed from many parts that each part needs special skills. For example, to develop software, you need several subgroups for various duties such as analyzing, programming, error detection, simulation and, so on.
Moreover, team working leads to saving more time, energy and cost during the project. As it was mentioned above example, when you want to work alone you should learn different skills and train some software to carry out your tasks. Since learning new things is time-consuming, you must spend more time, energy and most importantly cost. But in a team, each member is responsible and he or she has to improve his own skill for a special task and it is not necessary to spend the time to master on the whole of the project.
In addition, team working is based on relationship and communication among members so that they have to try to communicate with others in the best way. This leads to make new friendship and create a creative environment. So, apart from the formal aspect of work, individuals can be familiar with new views and different teats that help them to improve and promote their experiences. For instance, when I was a student at university, our teacher decided to divide class students to some groups to perform a project. At first, I do not anyone but after a while, we started to communicate with each other and after a week we could match so that after completion of the project, we kept our friendship.
In conclusion, team working has more benefits than work alone. In a group, tasks divided among members of the team and anyone is responsible for the project. Also, in team working time, energy and cost are saved and the project can finish faster. Finally, team working leads to make new friendship and creative environment. Thus team working will have better and more effective results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Harutyun Aslanyan | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | ASD | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | hnftskn | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | Harutyun Aslanyan | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Amin1990 | 76 | view |
- TPO 46 80
- The things we learn from our friends are more important than what we learn from our family 80
- TPO 23 73
- TPO 24 85
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.-Wait until the class or meeting is 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ew friendship and creative environment. Thus team working will have better and more ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, while, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89420654912 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68201528179 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528967254408 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6221627517 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.263157895 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.31578947368 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246436685849 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788374287382 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951907734015 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147191819311 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102006771995 0.0645574589148 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.