TPO 46
The reading passage claims that storing medical information on the electronic system is better than on paper forms and also mentions to some advantages of the electronic databases. However, the lecturer rejects these cases and says that the result of the electronic databases is uncertain.
Firstly, the reading passage says that electronic records need less cost to saving, moving, copying and faxing medical information rather than paper records and also doctors can have access to electronic medical record easier than paper forms but the lecturer states that most doctors use the paper form and keep patients information on paper as a backup.
Secondly, the reading passage claims that electronic medical records significantly reduce medical errors and increase the serious consequences for the patients' health. However, the lecturer refutes this idea and argues that electronic record cannot eliminate whole errors or mistakes. Most doctors still take note and write by hands in less time and staff and reader are familiar with doctor’s handwriting.
Finally, the reading passage says that electronic database is used by researchers to conduct research because all information gathered in the database and on paper forms collect this information is impossible but the lecturer explains that sorting information in a medical database is difficult and need permeations because the patients' information is confidential. Thus, it is possible some records are hidden.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-30 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
2021-09-27 | afgmar | 70 | view |
2021-08-12 | yasamiamirreza | 70 | view |
2021-04-22 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...crease the serious consequences for the patients health. However, the lecturer refutes t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...ficult and need permeations because the patients information is confidential. Thus, it i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65470852018 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76741568171 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502242152466 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.189914827 49.2860985944 222% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.625 110.228320801 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560279366886 0.272083759551 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245044455887 0.0996497079465 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136976976922 0.0662205650399 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362470616159 0.162205337803 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873870261426 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.3589403974 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.8541721854 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.7273730684 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.