Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation and are trying to decide between two places to visit. Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice? Why? ۱٫ Reading about the places online
۲٫ Discussing them with someone you know who has visited both places
In the modern era, a trip has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, people have always sought ways to enhance travel situations. Some people may hold the view that the best ways for finding information about host city for tripe are asking from people who travelled to those cities. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that affiliation ways for getting information about the destination are using the internet and online data. I content that the internet has up-to-date information about places and it is the best way of giving information. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first important factor to be mentioned is that the internet supported all the positive and negative aspect of places. To elaborate on my point, the internet has many websites that supported all place that people want to travel to them. In this situation, some site writers try to writing positive aspect of places, and some others write drawback aspects of places. So, people can better make decision when they read all aspect of places. Furthermore, online information has a lot of pictures from cities, and people can better analysis of them. Most of these cities have some parts that people can write their experience of travelling to cities. Hence, viewers not only read information from the site but also read the opinion of travelers. However, if individuals only ask someone who travelled to places, they may speak only about their experience. In other words, they would have merits or demerits memories about places so that they could not transfer correct information.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that the internet has a lot of information in one place. To shed more light on this matter, when people use the internet for finding and getting information, they have able to find all information about places such as pictures of the environment, sightseeing and many other places like these. Furthermore, travelers would read many sites at the same times, and gain a lot of information from places. In addition, some places have special parts that previous people did not visit them, so when people search on the internet they can find information from these places. Moreover, individuals find data about foods and souvenir of these cities.
All in all, considering the aforementioned reason leads us to the conclusion that the internet has more information than people. I believe that individuals not only find all the information about the positive and negative aspects of places but also find much information easily.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14976958525 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67613510925 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458525345622 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6545026557 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.590909091 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174715422657 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612462025501 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459127327872 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122504211155 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229715244972 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.