Is it better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.

The place where children grows will be very important part of their life. The life style and surrounding environment where a person spends their childhood has a major influence on his behavior and his/her career. Some might believe growing up in the countryside is better for children, and others might say big cities are better. In my view, children growing in Big cities is better than growing in countryside for two main reasons.

First, children get better education in big cities. If a person needs to be successful in his life should have particularly good education, without that it is difficult to have good career. Big cities will have exceptionally good schools and colleges when compared to countryside. So, children studying at these schools will have better future, as they get good education. For example, I have cousin named Gagan and he is of same age as me. Both of us have similar level IQ and brilliance. But now, after our educations I have better job than him because I lived in a Banglore City, one of the top 10 cities in India, I had better education when compared to him. As he stayed in rural area, he did not get good education and mentoring as I got, Due to which his career is also not good as mine. As we can see, if my cousin had lived in a city, he would have got better education, and he could have got better future than he has now.

Second, Big cities will have diversified people, who comes from various parts of the country and even various parts of the world because of which children learn a lot from them. For instance, As I spent my childhood in Banglore, I had friend in my school who was from Germany and i had learned Germany from him at that time. Latter during my Job, I got a project for which I needed to stay in Germany for 3 months. As i had learnt German in my school days, knowing the local language came extremely helpful to me during my stay there. As I met diversified peoples in my childhood, it helped me in my latter part of my life. These learnings would not have got, if I had grown in countryside.

Form the above personal experiences, I would prefer children to grow in Big City rather than countryside. Children's at Big cities will get better facilities, Not only education but also good health care, better coaching for sports and many other things. Additionally, children's meet many diversified people and they learn lot from them, which will be helpful in latter part of their life. A person's future majorly depends on his childhood, if he gets better education and opportunities to learn many things.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...d in my school who was from Germany and i had learned Germany from him at that ti...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59002169197 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57021241894 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457700650759 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3158045236 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0434782609 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08695652174 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17948795126 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679778308939 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809005525396 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137115729408 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819422530688 0.0645574589148 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.