is it better to work independently or with a group
People have different thoughts and opinions about the perfect way of doing a particular task. While many people argue that individual work is the best way to do it. I beg to differ. I believe that Teamwork helps tremendously in achieving goals.
Many people out there propose that group work can bring the team down, mainly when a team member acts recklessly by not doing his part of the job. In my opinion, Teamwork can have some flaws but the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Having multiple individuals expand the knowledge. My experience is a compelling illustration of this. In my sophomore year of dental school, I was assigned to execute an assignment about dental health awareness among people in Wisconsin. While some students chose to work independently, I decided to work with a group of five, including myself. Despite the fact that one of the peers was not up to the challenge, he did not help much with the work. The rest of the team were hard workers. Consequently, with the chance of exchanging ideas back and forth, and the diversity of opinions among us, helped significantly get more notions. As a result, our assignment was awarded as the best project among all the students in the class. If we did not work together, we would not be able to achieve this outstanding result.
Moreover, Teamwork plays an essential role in saving time. By dividing the tasks between the team member, there is an excellent chance of getting the job done in a remarkably low amount of time compared to solo work. Many people thus propose that Teamwork does not save time, especially with the presence of nonfunctional team members. However, in my opinion, I believe that group work is a powerful and effective way of saving time. As I previously mentioned about my group-work experience at the college and even in my recent job at the clinic. Teamwork always wins. Therefore whenever there is a chance for a group work, I sign myself in.
In conclusion, the ultimate goal in life is always to achieve the tasks perfectly. I strongly believe that Teamwork is the best way to perform it. It does not just save your time but also expands the knowledge and instills a good value of a healthy environment in the workplace.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-28 | ngaliulin | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | jimHsu | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | baishuhang2020 | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | baishuhang2020 | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-06 | jimHsu | 73 | view |
- Plastic bags are terrible for the environment They should be banned everywhere 70
- Do you prefer working independently or with a group 76
- Some young people are free in the evenings or have days off at school which way can bring them the most benefit 1 To accumulate work experience by a part time job or volunteering in a community project 2 Learning to play a sport 3 Learning to play a music 60
- which one do you prefer working on work assignment independently or as a group 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...perfect way of doing a particular task. While many people argue that individual work ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ob at the clinic. Teamwork always wins. Therefore whenever there is a chance for a group ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74851836073 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52987012987 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5805055847 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.92 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208749178619 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539734577251 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775410925484 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107420441165 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088789733206 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.