Is it a good idea to keep a pet such as a dog or a cat? What can you benefit from such an experience?
In today's world, there is a heating debate about whether animals should be kept outside of their habitats or not. In this regard, in my opinion, it is not a good idea for individuals to keep animals as pets in their houses, and I have two main reasons on which I will elaborate in the following essay.
First, all animals have better living conditions if they are in their natural habitat, which means keeping them in our houses as pets annoys them. Scientists have shown that all species prefer to have their normal life in the habitats in which they are beside their parents and other peers. In this way, they can easily find their mates and reproduce, and as a result, they will have a more enjoyable life and not be extincted easily. My personal example clarifies this. When I was 13, my parents bought me a puppy for my birthday. I got really happy at first, but after a while, I understood that it was acting unusual. So I decided to bring it back to its home, and see if anything would change. At the end when we returned it to its family and brought it to its natural habitat, the dog behavior completely changed, and made a lot of noise, and jumped up and down, indicating that it was very happy in the new situation.
Second, having lived along these pets, people will be attached to them, and this will lead to an increase of the average age of people in a country. In fact, there are lots of families that tend to have pets instead of babies. This is because keeping pets cost much less than having babies since parents have to send their children to school, then maybe to college, and also save some money for them to help them marry or own a house in the future. As a result, people are losing their tendacy to having children, and on the other hand, they are getting attached to their pets more and more. It is heard from many countries in the world that their population is getting older since parents do not feel a requirement to have babies anymore. This definitely would not have happened if people had not experienced living with pets.
Finally, I thing keeping pets in our homes is a good idea because in this way, the animals kept in houses will be annoyed, and also it will cause people to not try to have babies anymore, resulting in a population decline.
- Nowadays children rely too much on technology like computers smartphones video games for fun and entertainment playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children s development What do you think 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decesions about their own lives 73
- TPO 50 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take at least one class that teaches the culture of a country other than their own 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: YOU_THING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'think' or 'thinks'?
Suggestion: think; thinks
...rienced living with pets. Finally, I thing keeping pets in our homes is a good ide...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, really, second, so, then, while, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44180522565 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26914091969 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503562945368 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2426158167 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7647058824 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0867554751383 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.029076580463 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339870700415 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688429527115 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242612755248 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.