It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why?
There is not a shadow of doubt that nowadays restaurants play a significant part in our daily life. Although many people would oppose the construction of a new restaurant in their neighborhood, I personally support this decision and I will explore the reasons why I hold this opinion in the following paragraphs.
First, since I go to restaurants most often, a good nearby restaurant reduces my commute time. This will significantly help me to save time. I use restaurants for professional meetings, family gatherings and hanging out with friends and because there are no high quality restaurants near where I live, I drive relatively long distances every time. As a tangible example I recall that I had an important professional appointment at a distant restaurant. My commute took extremely long time due to the traffic jam. I was so late and thoroughly embarrassed that I could barely talk. Had our neighborhood had a decent restaurant, I could have prevented this from happening.
Second, restaurants provide great places to socialize and make friends, especially for old people. Old men and women can take a walk to the restaurant in the neighborhood and meet each other. Many elderlies live lonely and they need to socialize with others of their same age. This will effectively help prevent depression caused by solitude. My grandfather walks to a nearby café every evening. He plays chess and talks about many things with other old men there. He had met most of them in that café for the first time and now they are great friends. I imagine my grandfather would be so lonely if this café was not built.
In a nutshell, I strongly support building a restaurant in my neighborhood since it can help me save so much time and also help elderlies socialize and make friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Andres01 | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | dew2222 | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | gaoxiangluke | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Orwell1984 | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | nazaninnami | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 70
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? 70
- TPO 43 Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait un 78
- jgbfhtk 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e relatively long distances every time. As a tangible example I recall that I had ...
^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld have prevented this from happening. Second, restaurants provide great places...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9238410596 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93694423155 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9382638929 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6111111111 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.45110844103 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171908934151 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496783867144 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598442767002 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117890079469 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611919874746 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.