It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours

working hours have been an issue that is broadly discussed and defined by many approaches. But should employees work three days a week for short hours and get off for the rest of the week? Alternatively, should people work daily for fewer hours and enjoy the other days? Many people assume that workers are conspicuously happy and more productive when they work daily for fewer hours. However, it would be prudent to say that working for three full-time days is more beneficial than working daily. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explain in this essay.

First, it is important to consider that working three days a week would help employees have more spare time. Obviously, if employees work the entire week even with fewer hours, they can not enjoy their days, because they would be tired from going every morning to their work and getting back to their houses. In contrast, if they had worked for three days only and get rest for the other two days at home, they would have gotten more time to enjoy and having fun. As a result, working fewer days enables them to enjoy some free days and practice their hobbies. For instance, my father worked at a computer company, he had worked five days a week. Therefore, we could not see him a lot. Furthermore, he was tired after coming home so, we could not have a conversation with him. Hence, having a job for the half of the week is more adoring than working all week.

Besides the importance of having more time for relaxation and enjoyment, another significant reason is that working fewer days encourages workers to bond with their families. Evidently, when employees work all week, they would be away from their families, and cannot be with them when they need them. On the other hand, workers who work some days would have more days to spend with their families. Consequently, they would build a strong relationship with them. This is can be demonstrated with my personal example. At university, I have worked for a part-time job. I worked for 3 days a week and spent the rest with my family. Some days we had picnic in our big backyard, and sometimes we had to go to watch a movie together. If I had not worked for fewer days, I would not have enjoyed my days with my family. Yet, my friend had worked all week and could not see his family or spend some moments with them. Therefore, working fewer days aid with being bond with your people.

In conclusion, I believe that working some days a week with a longer duration is more beneficial than working daily with short period days. This opinion is because employees would get more relaxed, enjoy their lives, and have a stronger relationship with their families

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Working
working hours have been an issue that is broadl...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'picnicked'.
Suggestion: picnicked
...e rest with my family. Some days we had picnic in our big backyard, and sometimes we h...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'picnicked'.
Suggestion: picnicked
...e rest with my family. Some days we had picnic in our big backyard, and sometimes we h...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63522012579 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35786900731 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429769392034 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8012494569 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8888888889 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.03703703704 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432061237449 0.236089414692 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163756877389 0.076458572812 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114617584961 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318875978461 0.150856017488 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981137289189 0.0645574589148 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.