Life today is more easier and comfortable in comparison to when our grandparents lived.
Controversy exists over whether life today is more comfortable in comparison to the past when our grandparents were children. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that life today is more comfortable. However, some others may hold an opposite viewpoint and believe that the pastime people could live easier. As far as I am concerned, life is more comfortable than the past time because not only the quality of life has been increased but also, the development of technology happened. In the following paragraphs, I will pint point my case.
The first reason worth mentioning is that the quality of people improved in modern life. Nowadays, the number of hospitals and doctors is higher to the past. People pay more attention to their health care and visit the hospital more often. In the past, in some part of a country there was not a hospital and if a person got a harmful disease, he would die. But, todays people can finds care facilities very easy and because of that, the knowledge of people are enhanced when it comes to diseases. Moreover, with more equipment, doctors have discoverd more dangerous diseases and they also find its treatment. Therefore, a disease caused a loss of many people in old days, can be cured by medicine.
A further more subtle point is that the advancement of technolgy offer a lot of options for people who made life more convenient. Today, development of the technology happeing at a very fast pace and many discoveries has been made such as the high-speed Internet and mobiles. People can use the internet on their cell phones and video chat their family member. Also, when a person go abroad to continue his education, this video call assist him to feel like his family is near him which in the past days, was not plausible. Also, the enhancement of technology leads to the emergent of devices such as microwaves or refrigerators. People in the past, could not freeze their food since they did not have a suitable place to store it. In contrast, they could easily freez their food and also warm it by using microwaves.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, modern life is much more convenient due to improvement of the human's life and the fast pace development of technology.
- TPO 12 - It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.test sth 60
- TPO 7 Ecocertification for wood companies 76
- TPO 34 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 60
- TPO 13 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...rned, life is more comfortable than the past time because not only the quality of life ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...re convenient due to improvement of the humans life and the fast pace development of t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80927835052 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67939116153 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55412371134 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7309660102 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293879153086 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787945725884 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112083938116 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186889768178 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15196595376 0.0645574589148 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...rned, life is more comfortable than the past time because not only the quality of life ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...re convenient due to improvement of the humans life and the fast pace development of t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80927835052 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67939116153 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55412371134 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7309660102 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293879153086 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787945725884 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112083938116 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186889768178 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15196595376 0.0645574589148 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.