Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental
damage. Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty, such as a higher tax
when they cause the environmental damage. Others said there are better ways to stop
them from harming environment. What do you think is the best way to prevent the
environment from deteriorating?
Environmental damage is increasingly severe in the age of current society. With the developing of economy, when people purchase goods and enjoy services, they are supposed to realize that one of the main factors damage the environment is company productions. Someone suggests that asking companies to pay penalty is the best approach. From my perspective, I do not agree with it and consider that there must be better ways, for example, improving pollution treatment technology.
Admittedly, requiring penalty is of importance since the purpose of a business is to make a profit, so that companies usually attempt to reduce exception spending, such as penalty. If the government strict requirements about paying penalty for companies which cause environmental damage, these companies will be more likely to protect environment as we hope.
However, numerous cases prove that the profit companies earn is always much more than penalty. For example, the paper factory frequently leads to pollution because of using chemical materials to make production. They will benefit greatly through producing paper in the method that easily generates environmental problem, and that is why they prefer to pay for penal sum rather than stop working. Solving problems and restricting bad behaviors by money is actually not the best approach. The hunger for money is always unending. Thus, fostering people’s awareness of the necessity and helping companies be willing to consciously deal with pollution, like improving technology, is the most significant way to protect surrounding environment.
Furthermore, there is no better way to thoroughly solve environmental damage than developing pollution treatment technology. To be more specific, no matter what tactics we bring forward, the final purpose is avoiding damage of environment. There is no doubt that paying for penalty cannot decrease pollution from the root. If the paper factory tends to research method for changing toxic chemical raw materials and improving process, the pollution will be got rid of and meanwhile productivity will be boosted. This kind of win-win model comes into handy in current society.
To put it into a nutshell, although paying penalty can reduce the pollution to some extent, it is not the best way to protect our environment. Evoking people’s awareness and fundamentally solving environmental damage plays more crucial role and that is why I said there is another better way than asking for fines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other better way than asking for fines.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, in fact, kind of, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46753246753 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95060362138 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52987012987 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7624829479 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.789473684 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268384028504 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790349051764 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589197445792 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15813834486 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392318830334 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.