Many filmmakers make movies base on books. Some people prefer to read the book before they watch the movie, while other people prefer to watch the movie before they read the book. Which one do you prefer?
The remarkable and monumental change in society has taken place since the most pressing problems gripping the nation, starvation and poverty, have been settled. Now people are paying more time to enrich their spiritual world, including reading books and watching movies. As for the way to watch movies which base on books, some people prefer to read the book before they watch the movie. I prefer to watch a movie before reading a book in order to save time and form a better understanding of the book.
Firstly, watching the movies before reading the books could help us understand the content of the books. As is known to us, a movie could convey the content in an easy-understanding way because it converts silent words into lively and interesting communication and interactions. As audiences, we could not only hear the characters' voices but also see their facial expressions, which could help us understand the plots in the books better. It is particularly helpful when it comes to historical books. There are full of classical words in this kind of books. Thus, understanding these kinds of books need certain skills and capabilities and will be time-consuming. Watching the movies first could help us gain the main idea of the movie and provide us easy access to grasp the characteristics of each role. In this way, we could understand the content of the books in an easier way.
Secondly, watching the movies before reading the books could help us decide which book is worth to read. Nowadays, people are occupied by various kinds of things, like attending classes, finishing assignments and caring for the children. It is difficult for people to find leisure time to devote to books without interrupting. Plus, reading a book is time-consuming and energy-consuming. We tend to spend several days to read the whole book carefully. So, it will be a waste of time if we end up finding the book we have read is not worthy for spending much time reading. However, watching the movie in advance could allow us to select the most desirable books for us to read. Generally, watching a movie costs us about 2 hours. After watching the movies, we can form a general comprehension of the main ideas of the books and have a basic judgment upon the books based on our preferences. Thus, if we find the movie is not our taste, we can just give up the book. If we find the movie triggers our interests, we can just read the book carefully. Above all, it will save a huge amount of time for people to watch the movie before reading the book and people could use the time saved to read more books.
To cap, watching the movies before reading the books is not only time-saving but also give us enlightenment on which books to read and help us understand the main idea of the book.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Competition between friends usually negatively impacts friendships. Use specific details and examples to support your opinion. 76
- should children be required to spend sometimes in doing household chores 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take a public speaking course 73
- Many filmmakers make movies base on books. Some people prefer to read the book before they watch the movie, while other people prefer to watch the movie before they read the book. Which one do you prefer? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One can learn a lot about a person from the type of friends this person has. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as for, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2304.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74074074074 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72639024718 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434156378601 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6567251588 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.16 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.44 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.32 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420995785816 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154898619961 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154508092883 0.0737576698707 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320198181215 0.150856017488 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135413004189 0.0645574589148 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.