Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together.
Of those issues that many societies are involved and interested from time immemorial, the family is one of the most prominent. Close-knit families account for a topical subject igniting the enthusiasm of the public that whether it is imperative for individuals to have meals together with other members of families or not. Yet the best of my knowledge, I am of the opinion that all strata of any given society need to spent time with their families, and having dinner or launch can be considered as a situation that people get accompanied with other members of their families. In the following paragraphs, I lend credence to this view.
First and foremost, what provokes people to aggravate around a table and have meals with each other is that it brings joyful, gleeful time to them, cultivating a sense of collectivism. It is crystal clear that in today’s convoluted world, many are susceptible to assorted mental and physical diseases derived from living in metropolitan cities; the presence of which will lead to the haphazard, chaotic life. Considering all the value of having meals with family, people tend to spend time with each other, thereby maintain and improving their concrete relations, despite there has been probably many shortages of time. Correspondingly, it has been acknowledged that under no circumstances should parents to be left solely, leading them a sense of distress and anxious, pointing out to the fact that keep them apart from the empty-nest syndrome, which is prevalent in many first-world, developed countries impending them from progress in the future.
What is more, having regular meals along with family stimulate all members to have a healthy outlook on life, preventing them from having fast foods and junk foods. It stands to the reason that younger members can improve their eating habits as parents most of the time care about the general well-being of their children. In addition, adolescents and younger sibling are taught to eat healthier food, cultivating them to the salubrious lifestyle. In fact, neither do children spent money on expensive, unhealthy food nor do they eat junk food, only do have inexpensive, lucrative food with their families. Many studies have made it clear that due to the sedentary activities of juveniles and adolescents as well as eating high calorie outside foods, these young people are more vulnerable to hypertension, obesity, and so forth. To make a long story short, having regular meals together with other members of the family have miscellaneous, positive benefits to people.
In the final analysis, I have to reiterate my standpoint that it is rewarding that people have regular meals with their families. This is because they can have joyful time, and they can lead a healthy lifestyle. It is hoped that people be cognizant of the advantages of having meals with their family since life is ephemeral, steering individuals to spend more time with one another.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-02 | handsomepot | 90 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | handsomepot | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | handsomepot | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | andrew.w | 90 | view |
- Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one s own family 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child (5-10 years old)?1-being helpful2-Being honest3-Being well organized 90
- TPO44 73
- TPO1 8
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, thus, well, apart from, in addition, in fact, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2472.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13929313929 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7794026317 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2841671601 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.411764706 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2941176471 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252866954737 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970553850471 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966321753269 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178122883423 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576338644609 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.