In the past few years, a lot of comments have spread about the teamwork and grading system. There are some beliefs that all the members of a group, no matter which one is more efficient, should be evaluated as a whole, while others refute. Personally, I am of the opinion that individual parts of a group most be graded by their own efforts, not by the project. I believe this way because of the following reasons that I will explain in this essay.
First of all, there are always one or more persons in a group that they are not willing to do their best, or they have not the ability, so it will affect the project's success. The group in the universities and school is forming by a teacher or a professor. As a result, the members are chosen randomly to shape a group, not by their skill. In this matter, there are some who are an obstacle for the group and waste others' efforts. My experience demonstrates the reason. About four years ago, when I was assigned to a group project in the history class, there was a lazy student. In that semester, all of the group was working hard on the project and gathering data for the subject while he was doing something else. On the due date, finally, he did not prepare his part. Eventually, all of our effort because one person was wasted, and the project failed.
Second, when every part of a group grade separately, they are tried harder to get a better mark, and everything goes in a more convenient and efficient way. Suppose in a group besides assignment that persons should have to do, they constantly worry about whether others are doing well. Therefore, the tension among the group will be escalated and effect on the result. For example, in my history class project that I have mentioned earlier, one of our daily jobs was arguing with one student. For hours we tried to convince him to participate. If we had not this conflict, the result would be much better that we got.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that projects should be graded solely by every person's effort because of the project's success and convenience and efficiency that I have explored above.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 70
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours 40
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the past few years, a lot of comments...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons that I will explain in this essay. First of all, there are always one or mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'projects'' or 'project's'?
Suggestion: projects'; project's
... not the ability, so it will affect the projects success. The group in the universities ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e was a lazy student. In that semester, all of the group was working hard on the project a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on was wasted, and the project failed. Second, when every part of a group grade...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sult would be much better that we got. In conclusion, I firmly believe that pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ojects should be graded solely by every persons effort because of the projects success ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'projects'' or 'project's'?
Suggestion: projects'; project's
... by every persons effort because of the projects success and convenience and efficiency ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56842105263 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46563078746 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505263157895 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7635511493 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308156933406 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912356376068 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631770309191 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190279857654 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502438708852 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.