In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
Parents have played a tremendous role in making decisions for their children in the past. However, thanks to the advancements in communication technologies, young people are now capable of judging issues and arriving to the right choices. Therefore, I agree with the statement that juveniles today have the necessary skills to come to conclusions and make decisions that could change the course of their lives. I feel this way for many reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, parents have more connections than their kids. As we grow older, we come to know more people and make new friends. This, in turn, strengthen our abilities for judgement on different topics. Thus, it's safe to say that parents in the past had access to more information than their young through their wide range of acquaintances and also due to exposure to similar situations in their lives. this information and knowledge would come in handy whenever their children are about to face a turning point that could affect their future. My own experience is a compelling example on that. After graduating from high school, I was about to move to a different city to attend college. Unfortunately, I did not have any friends who could help me find good housing in this city since the dorms on campus had a bad reputation for having tiny rooms and limited meal options. When I talked to my father, he was able to give me a contact for his business partner who had an acquaintance in the city. Thanks to my dad, I reached out to his friend who advised me to apply for a students' housing that he knew about. I was finally approved for these student apartments, which were far more convenient than the dorms. Hence, in the past before the internet revolution, most young people needed their parents' networking and expertise to make critical decisions.
Secondly, The internet has replaced parents' advice in the modern era. Most young people nowadays are tech-savvy. When an issue arises in their life, they start researching all the sides and perspectives online to establish a road map. Social platforms allowed people to share valuable information about everything to the degree that you could make critical decisions about your life almost entirely and solely based on other people's experiences posted on the web. For instance, If I had to relive the previous example in the internet age, I would have found the internet even more beneficial than my parents' intervention. Thousands of websites with millions of reviews about real estate could have provided me with enough background to decide on which would have been the right place to live in. Consequently, young people are now empowered with new technologies to reach decisions on their own.
In summation, new communication tools have made the role of parents in their children's decision-making process less significant than it was in the past. The lack of access to sufficient knowledge sources made kids in the past more dependent on their caregivers. Nevertheless, the internet is offering an opportunity to build a more and more decentralized culture with information available to everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | nusybah | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | 3dra | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | naziii | 76 | view |
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Soon technology will provide smart cars that virtually drives themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and other technologies that w 83
- Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celebrity. 73
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 73
- yellow cedar 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e to similar situations in their lives. this information and knowledge would come in...
^^^^
Line 13, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with information available to everyone.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2640.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80269646644 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531428571429 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4989255562 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.538461538 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1923076923 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73076923077 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399949558024 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107725179143 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945576970629 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260592294943 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593759693604 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.