People learn things better from those at their own level, than from those at a higher level.

Essay topics:

People learn things better from those at their own level, than from those at a higher level.

We keep learning and grasping new ideas and thoughts from various people we face throughout our lives. Teachers set the ground for our educational process and since that point on we never give up exploring and growing more and more intelligent. However, the question is when the process of learning is more effective: when we learn from our teachers or peers. Personally speaking, I am inclined to think that the later one might the the better option, mainly for the reasons I will explore in the following body paragraphs.

Admittedly, teachers provide us with the appropriate and accurate information we need and strive to make the new ideas and concepts as clear and explicit as possible. However, I am strongly of the opinion that this new crude knowledge worths nothing, until it is shared with somebody else. And, in this case, it is our peers and classmates with whom we usually discuss our classes and new information. My experience is a compelling example of this. Last year, when my friend was struggling to remember new English words with their synonyms, I simply told her to prepare definitions of such words and say it out loud to me as if she was trying to explain me the meaning of those words. As a result, she completed the rest of her vocabulary in just 2 days, while on the first part she had spent over a week.

In addition to this, teachers quite often fail to simplify their ideas and words, while explaining new materials or trying to answer some questions. On the other hand, students often perform much better when it comes to explaining something to their classmates. Though a little strange, this is quite true, just because students do not try to look like good teachers and make an impression of experts, and just do it using their everyday words and speech. For example, now I am a chess volunteer in a particular charity organization, and I made a great revelation for myself. That is: children admire the young volunteers more than their permament specialized teachers. And this is because the very reason I mentioned above. Volunteers in this case, who do not have much teaching experience, just try to make the children feel comfortable and see friends in them, rather than strict and confident teachers.

In the light of the reasons, mentioned above I do believe that people of our same age are the best way of acquiring and formulating knowledge, as we feel comfortable with them, constantly sharing our information and speaking the same language.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-22 ChristineSmb 90 view
2019-11-09 Negarmaleki 73 view
2019-08-28 siri25 73 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s more effective: when we learn from our teachers or peers. Personally speaking, ...
^^
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...lined to think that the later one might the the better option, mainly for the reasons I...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...lined to think that the later one might the the better option, mainly for the reasons I...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., constantly sharing our information and speaking the same language.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, while, for example, in addition, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85948477752 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70034894979 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548009367681 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0325456082 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.277777778 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7222222222 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0928861436932 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.02852996581 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362119163705 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0507756950916 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321342944604 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.