People should know events happening around the world even if they have little influence on their daily lives.
Undoubtedly, paying no attention to the events which have little relation with us may save our time to do other more crucial things. However, we will lose a precious opportunity to broaden our horizons. Therefore, I could hardly agree more with the statement that people should know events happening around the world even if they are not relative to our daily lives, the reasons of which would be illustrated as follows.
Initially, learning about events happened all over the world have several merits for our study and work. For one thing, it will improve our academic performance. If we have an intense inclination of the news happened in the global world, even though they seem have little influence on our daily lives, such news is likely to trigger our interests to learn more knowledge in a broader domain. The news concerning economy, military and politics would abet us to do more academic research in various area. As a result, our academic performance will be improved. For another, it will lay a solid foundation for our future career. To state it more clearly, the current corporations requires employees have a good command of various expertise such as knowing policies in different countries and financial trends in other cosmopolitan firms. Hence, if we could learn more about the events happening around the world, more precious working expertise and experiences we would obtain, so we will win more competitiveness, which paves the way for our future career. Therefore, only with the help of the news occurring all over the world, can I derive such merits.
In addition, knowing about events happened around the world enable us to maintain a life-long relationship and make new acquaintance with our fellows. Watching televisions and reading newspapers make us learn about more arresting topics we could talk with our friends. Hence, the relationship would be maintained. For instance, I always prone to read newspapers about NBA sports events. During lunch time I could tell such things like which basketball player has a better skill or which sports team rank high. Gradually, more classmates tend to join us and talk about with us. Therefore, I make more friends and maintain the relationship. On the contrary, if I just enjoying my lunch without talking with my fellows because I pay no attention about the events happened in the world so we have no topics, it is hard for me to make new acquaintance and maintain relationship with them.
Accordingly, but for the help of knowing the events happening around the world, I would not have established close rapports with my friends.
In a nutshell, what I prefer depends on my own experiences, life-style and emotional concerns. To be frank, I prone to choose the idea that people should know events happening around the world even if they are not relative to our daily lives.
- People should know events happening around the world even if they have little influence on their daily lives 87
- Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does 85
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person However some people think that it is a good quality for a person 73
- Universities should require every graduation student to take public speaking courses 85
- Parents should allow children to make their own choices rather than determine their children s future for them 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, for one thing, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2383.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01684210526 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73990597732 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469473684211 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1916633189 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.608695652 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.652173913 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283711662349 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862346490691 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123445972624 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22200264646 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824544040616 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.