Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
When we see athletes releasing their sweat in the Olympic Games to win glory for our country, we see the honor brought by sports. So some people argue that the government should invest more money in the development of sports rather than the construction of art. However, this conclusion is very illogical and absurd. From the perspective of human spiritual culture, art civilization and national prestige, I firmly believe that the government should give more money and energy to support art.
The government\'s strong support for the development of art can effectively reduce the disappearance of art and culture. With the development of science and technology society, more and more art and cultural heritages have disappeared from the world due to modern production technology. Our ancestors, with their own diligence and wisdom, have achieved one after another artistic and cultural heritage. As the inheritors of ancient art and culture, we are committed to making the wisdom of our ancestors spread forever, so the support of the national government for art and culture is essential and very important.
In addition, the results show that literature and art have a unique role in reflecting people\'s spiritual life and displaying people\'s spiritual world. A variety of art forms can enhance people\'s awareness of the true, the good and the beautiful, so as to achieve the positive effect of edifying sentiment and improving human\'s own quality. For example, the Renaissance at the end of the 13th century not only brought a large number of art works to the world, but also liberated people\'s minds and promoted the progress of human society. Therefore, it can be seen that it is beyond reproach for the government to spend more money on supporting art construction.
Nevertheless, there are voices that show that achievements in sports can bring more honor and prestige to the country. Ironically, such recognition is very shallow. As we all know, Rome was not built in a day, and Chinese art and culture were spread far and wide. These were not achieved through sports achievements. Achievements made through sports can only temporarily enhance the reputation of a country. In the long run, only paying great attention to the development of art and culture can make a country have a long-term reputation.
All in all, I firmly believe that the government should spend more energy and money to achieve the development of art. But it\'s undeniable that, as my favorite saying goes, a thousand readers have a thousand Hamlets, and some people will definitely disagree with me. However, I believe that they will choose to support me after reading my article.
- Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does 85
- People should know events happening around the world even if they have little influence on their daily lives 87
- Universities should require every graduation student to take public speaking courses 85
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person However some people think that it is a good quality for a person 73
- Parents should allow children to make their own choices rather than determine their children s future for them 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore money and energy to support art. The government\s strong support for the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure is essential and very important. In addition, the results show that liter...
^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...f the true, the good and the beautiful, so as to achieve the positive effect of edifying...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nd of the 13th century not only brought a large number of art works to the world, but also libera...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oney on supporting art construction. Nevertheless, there are voices that show...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...country have a long-term reputation. All in all, I firmly believe that the go...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, as to, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12844036697 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8439257155 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495412844037 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1058216574 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.476190476 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294427082154 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890085644398 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981454188831 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170647835299 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813832611917 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.