pet
Nowadays, due to developments of technologies and economy, many people can get more income than in the past, which allows them to spend surplus money on other things, such as hobby, travel. A lot of people often use the money to buy pets. However, with the demand for goods of pets, their price gradually becomes expensive. Thus, there is a controversy about whether spending on pets is good. Some people think that the utility of what expend a lot of the money to tame has boundaries. Consuming pets or their items is not a waste of money because people can relieve their stress, grow their social skills, and be helped with many things by pets.
First of all, people will vastly improve interpersonal skills through taming pets. This is because domesticating animals necessarily requires people's hands, and in this process, they will learn how to communicate and cooperate effectively by overcoming their ingoing personality. As for my sister, for instance, my timid sister started to take care of a dog to remove her ashamed character. By talking with her dog, she could develop a sense of courage. As a result, she could make friends easier with her social and collaboration skills. Had it not been for her dog, she would not have been able to develop herself into such a sociable and capable person. It becomes clear with the example that taming pets are beneficial for being outgoing and improving their sociability.
Besides the advantage for pets to be a remedial book to learn social skills, the more significant reason is that people will build good health, helping them to work better in the end. Nowadays, competitive due to the employment difficulty and the economic crisis, called Great Lockdown caused by Covid-19, since contemporary society is, it is inevitable for youngsters to get psychological burden and pressure from beat their brain out; this drudgerous situation disturbs the people from focusing and working hard. Furthermore, currently, young people today live alone, do, most of them often feel lonely. The best way for people to recover their exhausted minds and bodies is to tame pets. In fact, one study that experimented with the possibility of what domesticating animals helps people diminish their stress shows that pets can aid people to unwind about their works and the feeling of loneliness. The researcher demonstrated that groups of people who tame pets tend to increase dopamine, known as the happiness hormone, accomplish their affairs well-oiled by recuperating the environment in their bodies. Such results clearly depict that since, by ameliorating their psychological or physical conditions, the capability to complete people’s work do pets enhance, important is what tames animals.
In conclusion, investing in pets helps is enough valuable, enhancing the quality of people's life. People can reduce their stress, and after all, when taking their pets, people can take their mind off their works and relaxing them physically and psychologically from feeling lonely. The better states help people to work more efficiently. In addition, they can learn communication skills by disciplining their pets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | mti8 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | mjw0413 | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Toe_test | 60 | view |
- The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people 76
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 70
- It is more important for teachers to connect with students than to be experts in their fields 73
- When people spend a lot of time watching sports on television or following their favorite team it has negative effects on their lives 73
- pet 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, after all, as for, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2652.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22047244094 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76743090561 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545275590551 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1155202286 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148947790035 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597369105305 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891579207173 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104185699074 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434169786507 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.