Science will soon make people live up 100 or even 200 years. Some believe that this is a good thing, while others disagree. Discuss both views, and give your own opinion.
By developing technology in the last decads on the medical aspect, the people can live more 100 years. Besides, science prevents them from illness and significant issues like a heart attack. However, a few people are opposed to prolonged life, which is rooted in a religious perspective. From my point of view, there is some factor, which should be considered by scientists for improving a more comfortable life. This essay attends to examine this controversial issue.
In the first step, some people have an attitude based on having long term life. Medical society struggles to help people to be healthy by the state of the art drug or vaccine. The way of explanation, the medical centers are exposed to produce an annual vaccine to solve some global pandemic around the world. In particular, the COVID-19, which is spread out by some animals, is a hazardous virus that can kill people's gray population. Moreover, Due to Genetic mutations, the range of people under dangerous circumstances should be sustained by a new vaccine.in this case, life can play an essential role for us. Inconsequent, the advancement of the medical aspect are acted as a vital element for having at least 100 years of living.
Additionally, some religious opinions have a negative attitude to cross with scientific long-life. In general, this vision of people is against scientific society. Besides, they believe that God defines the period time of life for humankind. In Iran, to illustrate, the religious people say that in Islam, the supernatural rule can determine the age of people. Notably, the ones whom people respect as a leader say that the age of people is to belong by prying and reading Quran. Nonetheless, a long-distance between religious practice and the people can exert a negative impact on life. So it seems that the psychological vision can prove this kind of idea.
Finally, in my idea, the progress in science for long term life should be limited by some rules. It should be considered that a crucial balance should regulate a few plans for controlling dense populations and the rate of death and breeding. For example, the energy resources are limited by specific of the people are staying in some area. The novel research has shown that the vast number of energy sources in the west of Europe is ended until 2050. To address this problem, the rate of death and breeding should be controlled by governments worldwide. As a result, having an essential balance for keeping the natural resource depends on the role can restrict the lives of the people.
In conclusion, the advantage of scientific advancement has a long life for people, but some religious ones fight against this medical benefit. Besides, from my perspective, we should adopt a pivotal role to avoid the increasing population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-20 | amir_gha67 | 73 | view |
- If you are going to graduate from the university and have to choose the final course,which professor will you choose? The one you used to sign up for courses or the oneyou have never learned from before? 61
- Without capital punishment our lives are less secure and crime of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 3
- The internet could revolutionize the world in the future if everyone could have easy access to all information that is available o the world wide web Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends? 60
- Science will soon make people live up 100 or even 200 years Some believe that this is a good thing while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal aspect, the people can live more 100 years. Besides, science prevents them fr...
^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...les to help people to be healthy by the state of the art drug or vaccine. The way of explanation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, at least, for example, in conclusion, in general, in particular, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2340.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02145922747 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78710344701 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512875536481 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 16.0 3.08781362007 518% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.552950337 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96153846154 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138196824085 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426510482682 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235143712208 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822004947826 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300561260048 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.