should parents check their childrem text messages
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects when it comes to parents reading their children's text messages. If it were up to me, I would say they should check messages only if a child is the age of 12 or below. I would explain the reasons in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, if children are 12 years old or younger, there are many things they do not understand or they are in a way ignorant of the danger online. We have all seen the awful things that can happen to a child that is on the internet. With a parents’ supervision, kids can be safe from things like cyberbullying or predators trying to hurt them. Drawing from my own experience, I had a friend who was bullied via text message; her mom never knew about this, and my friend was ashamed about it so she never told her. One day her mom accidentally looked at my friend's phone and that was how she found out. As a result, my friend's mom talked to the principal and everything got better. For this reason, I think parents should check their children's text messages.
Secondly, I think it is a good way to see what type of friend a child has, if they are respectful, not calling each other names, or if they talk to strangers. They can be making fun of someone, thinking it is just a text and nobody will see this, or ‘’I can call this person a really ugly name, it is just a number, they will not know it is me’’. They can start talking with a stranger, and they do not know that could be very dangerous and could cause an awful amount of trouble. If parents start to check text messages, all of these things would not happen, no one would be hurt or be made fun of.
In light of the reasons I have mentioned, I strongly believe that parents should check their children's phones to keep them and others safe from cyberbullying and people who are up to no good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-02 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | docaotri123 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | docaotri123 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-20 | yusra | 86 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'parent'.
Suggestion: parent
...e and negative aspects when it comes to parents reading their childrens text messages. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny things they do not understand or they are in a way ignorant of the danger onli...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that is on the internet. With a parents’ supervision, kids can be safe from thing...
^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally looked at my friends phone and that was how she found out. As a result, my f...
^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... someone, thinking it is just a text and nobody will see this, or ‘’I can call th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, really, second, secondly, so, i think, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3125 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38354812263 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8632695012 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215812449845 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808316073433 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113413990844 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163258805035 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714255812795 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.