Some people believe that human harm earth, other think that human activity benefit the earth.
Our plant is so important to us. We should protect our plant from human’s destructions. Some people think that human activities benefit the earth. Others think that human begins inventions benefit the earth. Although I understand their point of view, I have a different opinion. I believe that human activity danger the earth. Human causes a lot of pollution, and Human cause a lot of changes in the environment.
Human’s activity causes a lot of danger to the earth. Pollution is one of the most harm caused by people inventions. People modern life cause a lot of pollution to our earth. For example, people invent the cars to facilitate their life style. It becomes easy to come and go after the invention of the cars. Consequently, peoples start to create other way of transportation like the public transportation, buses, taxes, and trains. All these invention lead to pollute the earth, smog is one of the most dangerous side effects of cars inventions, which has carbon mono oxide. Smog has hazardous effect on people’s health, like lung disease, Tuberculosis and lung caner. As you see human inventions cause a lot of danger and side effect to the Earth.
Human beings cause enormous changes to the environment. With the increase in the population of the people around the world, people decided to increase their habitat, by destroying all the forest and the green space. Hence human activity destroyed many animals habitat by the disturbance of the wet land and the green house effect. Many animals like frogs and some insects start to extinct. Human activity leads to the extinction of animals. Moreover, human activity cause disturbance in green house gases, carbon dioxide gas increase and oxygen decrease. All of the human activity causes effect on the ozone layer which danger our earth not benefits it.
In conclusion, human activity causes a lot of harms to our earth. Human activity has a negative effect on the people health. Furthermore, human activity cause side effect on the ozone layer. I believe that human harm the earth not benefit the earth.
- For success in the future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 70
- TPO INTEGRATED ELEPHANTS BEHAVIORS 51 60
- Young people have no influence on the important decision that determine the future of society as a whole. 60
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this invention' or 'these inventions'?
Suggestion: this invention; these inventions
...ortation, buses, taxes, and trains. All these invention lead to pollute the earth, smog is one ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ing all the forest and the green space. Hence human activity destroyed many animals h...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ce. Hence human activity destroyed many animals habitat by the disturbance of the wet l...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 556, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...oxide gas increase and oxygen decrease. All of the human activity causes effect on the ozo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08670520231 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69657980615 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453757225434 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1041174512 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.1851851852 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8148148148 20.6045352989 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552378438187 0.236089414692 234% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202965592925 0.076458572812 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.205202713325 0.0737576698707 278% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.424695581792 0.150856017488 282% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158108604684 0.0645574589148 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 58.1214874552 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.35 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.