Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to

Essay topics:

Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to schoolwork. Which of the two approaches do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Parents are spending less time with family due to mounting competitive pressure in contemporary society, which prompts rethinking on the most effective way to improve parent-children relationship. While others may reasonably believe that helping children with schoolwork is a good method because it improves learning efficiency, I am convinced that parents should spend more time playing with children. Not only does it enhance family relationship, it also improves children’s physical condition.

There is no denying that doing school assignments with children can improve their learning efficiency. Parents are more educated and more knowledgeable than their children, which means that they can impart on their children effective learning methods or more effective ways of solving problems. That being said, it must be emphasized that it is not obtaining knowledge, but the ability to learn and to analyze, that is the ultimate goal of education. Only by thinking and researching on their own can children understand knowledge thoroughly, which means that they should finish homework unassisted, even if it takes a long time.

Furthermore, playing with children can also improve family relationship. Nowadays parents are often too over-worked to spend time with their children, as a result of which both parties find few common interests. Playing with children provides an effective remedy to said problem. For young children, it is a good opportunity to spend time doing something they like with their parents; for parents, it is a good chance to communicate with their children. In many large cities, such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou, companies are setting up “courses” where parents can play games with young children under the supervision of experts in child-rearing. They are given chances to participate in group competition which both interest them and provide opportunities where they must exchange strategies and collaborate, thus binding them close together.

Last but not least, doing sports has the additional benefit of enhancing children’s physical condition. Childhood is a period when people develop physical characters, which requires a lot of physical exercise. By playing with children, parents can ensure that they do not spend time on other distractions, such as TV and video games. I often went swimming with my father when I was younger. I don’t enjoy playing sports, preferring to listen to music or to play video games. Because my father forced me to swim regularly every week, it became one of my habits and I gradually went voluntarily, summer and winter. As such, it became one of my few opportunities to exercise.

In conclusion, while doing homework with children is a good bonding mechanism, it has, as I demonstrated, its shortcoming. On the other hand, playing with children has the double benefits of improving parent-children relationship and strengthening children’s physical health. As such, it’s my belief that parents should play games or do sports with their children.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-23 nusybah 73 view
2020-01-22 farzaddanaei 73 view
2020-01-22 farzaddanaei 73 view
2020-01-14 3dra 63 view
2020-01-12 mucahit11 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user FlorisHH :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2607.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54680851064 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15198242533 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508510638298 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3265514656 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.347826087 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4347826087 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78260869565 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285093839673 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958721634895 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726432312038 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181497788243 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343521597129 0.0645574589148 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.