Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently, while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Globalization is making exotic cuisine much more easily available than ever before. Mid-priced chain restaurants spring up, and dining out is quite prevalent among modern young people. When it comes to which is better, eating out or eating in? From my perspective of view, I definitely choose to eat at home, in terms of health and the lower cost, even though some people claim that eating at restaurants is super convenient and time-saving.
To begin with, eating at home is always healthier than eating out, since the food from restaurants contains huge numbers of salt and fat, in order to be tasty, which leads to severe health problems, such as high blood pressure, obesity and other diseases. On the contrary, if we cook at home, we can strictly set the amount of taking-in ingredients and utilize healthier ways to cook, like stewing and steaming, instead of frying. Thus, the calories we take in are under controlled and we can maintain good shape. Let me take two of my best friends, Oliver and Stella, as an example to illustrate this. Oliver is an extremely heavy man, for he has been addicted to the tastes of fast food, like fried chips and hamburgers, for several years. In contrast, Stella does have a slim shape by keeping a balanced diet and preparing the salad and fruits every day. Apparently, homemade meals are quite helpful to keep a healthy lifestyle.
In addition, eating at home is more economical than eating out, as the supermarket makes diverse food materials, ranging from locally grown to imported, available at a rather low price owing to the advanced transportation and agricultural technology. Consequently, the cost of meals made at home is considerably lower than that of the food served by the restaurants. On the other hand, when we take dinner at restaurants, the bill includes not only meals, but also the service and the environment, since the restaurants need to rent a house and hire the servants. Furthermore, the fees of fuel and parking lot need to be taken into consideration as well. Had we calculated all the potential costs together, we should notice that eating out is much more expensive than eating in.
Admittedly, restaurants do provide convenience in the food-preparing and washing dashes progress, which results in precious time saved. What I want to emphasize is that these people just neglect the expenditure on transportation. Traffic jam is always an unavoidable issue for big cities, and the time wasted on the road is probably much more than that needed for preparing food and washing dishes. Therefore, traffic congestion makes eating out become a time-consuming option.
So based on the reasons above, I prefer to eat at home, for the reasons that it can help me keep a healthy life-style and save me a lot of money. Albeit some people claim that it is more convenient to eat out, heavy traffic jam cannot be ignored.</span><br>
- Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently, while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why? 90
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called t 90
- The most important thing the government should do to improve health care is to clean the environment. 90
- Your teacher assigns a project to you, and you can select the members to work with.-choose the members who think and work in similar ways-choose the members who have totally different ideasWhich would you think is more effective to work with? 90
- People in daily lives would frequently do the jobs that need creativity such as the job you have never done before Under this circumstance do you prefer to work alone or work with others 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2467.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03469387755 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12230291775 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563265306122 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2527305007 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.136363636 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261886246959 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667418735441 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583668234143 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138681789202 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034746469207 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.