Some people have ambitious dreams and keep pursuing them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better and why?
With the media industry thriving in recent decades, the public can have access to news from various sources, such as televisions, radios and the internet. However, some people think the media are becoming less reliable than in the past. As far as I’m concerned, I agree with this opinion for following reasons.
First off, in order to get high audience or click rate, some media may report news without further verification, which may lead to a higher incidence of incorrect news. With the boom of new media, people tend to get information from various social networks, such as Twitter and Facebook, other than conventional TV and newspapers. Since people now have more flexibility as to where to watch news. Media companies are thus competing fiercely with each other for a higher market share more than ever. Plus, living in such an updating society, the public are unprecedentedly eager to be instantly informed about what is happening around the world. Given the existing competition from their counterparts and increasing demand for news timeliness from customers/patrons, some news reporters may sacrifice accuracy of news for its timeliness, since they know their coverage will have a better chance of getting the highest audience or click rate if they make the timeliest report of hot events. Even, they might elaborately fabricate stories to gain public attention.
Secondly, these days, the credibility and expertness of media practitioners are deteriorating. Due to the proliferation of new media, the practicing threshold of this industry has been lowered. In the past, only those with qualifications can be recognized as news reporters, while at present, one’s social network account can serve as a platform for the expression of public opinions and information. For example, a blogger with over 10 million followers can be more influential in people’s perspective of particular news event than a famous journalist.However, if they haven’t received proper training in journalism, they probably lack objective perspective and are thus not so professional at presenting a particular news event to the public in an unbiased and professional manner as qualified media practitioners do. So they may generate unfaithful news without realizing its inaccuracy. What’s more,the spread of a piece of news is so fast in this information era no matter it is real or not, adding to the non-negligible incidence of fake news. Not to mention the notorious companies which make use of media hype to promote their products.
Admittedly, the supervision/surveillance from the authorities and the public can lower the chance of inaccurate news to some degree. And the majority of media are reporting news under certain laws.While the incidence of inaccurate news remains high because of the low price the media would have to pay if they violate the rule and the insufficient supervision on new media professionals.
A conclusion can be drawn that the media are less concerned about the accuracy of news owing to the pursuit of high audience rate and the lowered credibility of media practitioners.
- When you visit a strange city guided tour or explore by yourself 93
- Which kind of professors will you choose when selecting the courses?1. Some professors who are voted to be the most popular one.2. Some professors who are rewarded of outstanding research. 73
- People nowadays are busier than ever in work and school. They want to spend more time to learn new things. Which one will you choose to learn?A. Learn a new sport that you have never played before.B. Learn to cook food different from what you have learn 90
- Government should spend more money on environment protection than on economic 57
- Some people prefer to play team sports, while others prefer to play individual sports. Which do you prefer and why. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th this opinion for following reasons. First off, in order to get high audience...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cate stories to gain public attention. Secondly, these days, the credibility an...
^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...lar news event than a famous journalist.However, if they haven't received proper t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 923, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...alizing its inaccuracy. What's more,the spread of a piece of news is so fast in...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... media hype to promote their products. Admittedly, the supervision/surveillance...
^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...a are reporting news under certain laws.While the incidence of inaccurate news remain...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upervision on new media professionals. A conclusion can be drawn that the media...
^^^
Line 9, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ered credibility of media practitioners.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2753.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.18651685393 4.8611393121 127% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 5.43304612099 2.67179642975 203% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568539325843 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 827.1 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 55.0 20.1344086022 273% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 324.055550793 48.9658058833 662% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 344.125 100.406767564 343% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 55.625 20.6045352989 270% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.45110844103 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0714902076199 0.236089414692 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338623689257 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340387387429 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0439819430645 0.150856017488 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334870312233 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 35.5 11.7677419355 302% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -9.73 58.1214874552 -17% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 6.10430107527 280% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 28.3 10.1575268817 279% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 19.51 10.9000537634 179% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.01818996416 138% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 24.0 10.0537634409 239% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 20.0 10.247311828 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.