Changing world have its own new demands like new technology, new ideas, new science so that we can explore untouched areas like space and core of earth. in history Da vinci, an artist had given many complex diagrams of different instruments like plane we can read them as history but to go in space we need advanced technology of plane. In human history there was no science. life without science was miserable. for the progress one has to focus on science and new technology. New technology like nanotechnology has opened a new door in every field of science. To live with this compitting world everyone must learn new technology. In history there were no mobile phones and computers. Before few decades only few people were master in this but today we can see them everywhere. One critic said that with food, shelter, clothing mobile with internet is important for this new world. Through science of internet we can easily access many databases of history.it will save our time.
When we go ahead we must look back in our history where we can see the progress of technology and problems faced by them. There are lots of success and failure. We can learn from there failures.Thomas Alva Edison, a scientist who invented light bulb. While discovering bulb he failed 999 times he tried all the metals and gases that can be used in bulb. Its history from this we can learn 999 ways that cannot be used for bulb preparation and by taking in to consideration that a single successful way we can use in the future. In the field of research the history plays vital role because for research many scientist had devoted their whole life but its still incomplete. We can read this history and run his research ahead which will save time.
In past many warlike conditions were happened from history we learn not to create war conditions. Nuclear bomb blast of Hirosima and Nagasaki had left large impact on human and nature history ,until now we are facing problems in affected area of Japan.
In my views no subject is greater History and Science both are necessary and crucial for good life. Co-ordinated approach of both these subject is important for survival in real world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...hed areas like space and core of earth. in history Da vinci, an artist had given m...
^^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Life
... In human history there was no science. life without science was miserable. for the ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ce. life without science was miserable. for the progress one has to focus on scienc...
^^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thomas
...ilure. We can learn from there failures.Thomas Alva Edison, a scientist who invented l...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 604, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many scientists'.
Suggestion: many scientists
...y plays vital role because for research many scientist had devoted their whole life but its st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...large impact on human and nature history ,until now we are facing problems in affe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, still, while, as to, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74603174603 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49892897189 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534391534392 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4955937121 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5454545455 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.45110844103 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144366507222 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480964491864 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043194794587 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102907990697 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779250972999 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.