Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?
Technology has developed society for all over the years and one of the reasons is the emergence of Internet. Some people support that Internet is a helpful tool to access a lot of information on real time while others defend that this amount of information is not useful. Personally, I strongly believe that so much information may be not good for some people and I feel this way for several reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First, children are the most vulnerable people that access Internet. Although they are young, Internet is a reality on their lives and they have this contact since early. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I have a nephew who is ten and he already knows how to use Internet on laptop. However, my sister allowed him to use it only to watch videos to assist with his homework and to play educational games.
In addition, accessing a lot of information may not be helpful for those who want read only news they are used to. For instance, elderly people are used to read news in few sections they like and a lot of information creates problems. I remember when I had taught how to access Internet to my grandfather and after a few days he was using the computer by himself. Despite the fact that reading news on Internet is faster than other media he was confused with a lot of information provided. As a result, he decided to stop using computer and went back to reading only the news in the newspaper that he wanted which was sports section.
In opposite, Internet provides some benefits such as searches and long-distance interactions. Nowadays, people can search any subject on Google in a matter of seconds and it is rather helpful to students. Furthermore, internet assisted to shorten distances. For example, relatives who live far from each other are able to talk on real time on Skype.
In conclusion, I am convinced that even tough Internet has so much information it can be a problem. This is because Internet may be harmful to vulnerable people like children and it is not helpful for those who want to read only one type of subject.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 70
- Smartphones should not be given to their children 73
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 70
- A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 60
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66577540107 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65801357688 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8542487671 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8421052632 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273264339039 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853632977956 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666524113304 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149949428729 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484869149478 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.