A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
In my opinion, teaching is a gift. I always had a professor who was memorable to me. When I knew that I would have a professor’s class which I liked, I used to go to school or university happier. I strongly believe that a teacher’s ability to relate well with student is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. I have three different reasons to support this thought.
First of all, the students are different from each other. For example, some may find it easy to learn Math. On the other hand, others may find easier to learn History. The professor’s role in this situation is to know how to teach differently a subject to make everyone understand. The most important is that all students learn, not a small group. That is why the professor’s ability to relate well is supposed to be important.
In addition to this positive effect, students used to enjoy and learn more with professors who have ability to relate well with them. An excellent knowledge of the subject being taught by professors is important, but the way how it is related is more important. Furthermore, skilled professors are able to encourage students to follow their careers, helping to increase the number of professors and researches.
Nowadays, the world changes rapidly with the technology and internet. Everyone is connected the whole day. Students can find answers on Google in a matter of seconds. Good professors have to improve themselves to follow these changes. There are some different ways to relate with students using technology in order to make them pay more attention to the subject. For example, professors are using tools such as Power Point classes; online classes for those who live far from the school or university and online chats to students ask questions out of class. The best option to choose is up to professors and their ability to teach is essential.
A question has been raised whether a professor’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. The students are different from each and the professor’s ability to teach is so important to make them enjoy the class. Also, professors should look for the best way to use technology tools in order to follow world changes. That is why I agree with the statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | anasemad11 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | anasemad11 | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | oscar21 | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | SERDARKOCAK | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | NidhiKalani | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 70
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 70
- Travel is important for personal development. 66
- A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 60
- It is better to have lots of different friends than it is to have just a few friends 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, second, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97709923664 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9105166152 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460559796438 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6415215133 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.24 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.72 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452163198844 0.236089414692 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134835181171 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218536487882 0.0737576698707 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309155631371 0.150856017488 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131441702585 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.