Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Global warming and air pollution are two major environmental problems that threaten our lives. The best way to decrease such problems is to take action and run programs and projects. Hence, I think that government should invest on programs that can save environment. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, environment is a part of human’s life where they interact with. If it is polluted, it can adversely affect individual’s health and will endanger their lives. Thus, if government fund programs that can protect the environment, the rate of sickness will drop and the number of causalities made by environmental problems will reduce. For instance, Kabul, the capital of my country, was listed as the first polluted city in the world in 2018, so the number of sick people had increased exponentially last year. As a result, the government run a program named Plant for Peace this year by which fifty-thousand trees were planted across the country and more than hundred-thousand Afghanis were spent. Fortunately, according to local news, the city is cleaner than last year, and it can be seen that the program was very effective.
Secondly, investing on programs to improve environment can help for economy of the country. There are lots of tourists who visit various countries annually, so it is clear that most of them would like to spend some time and enjoy from their visit. If government run programs to improve the environment, the number of tourists will increase, which is a huge assistance to economy of the country. For example, Band-e-Amir is one of the beautiful places of my country. The number of tourists who visit there is more than one-hundred-thousand per year. However, it was not the case three years ago when the place was not clean: it was one of the dirtiest locations of my country. But after a program launched by the government, the site turned in to one of most-visited sites in Afghanistan.
To put it in a nutshell, I believe that it is more important for governments to support programs that are beneficial to the environment. This is because it can save humans’ lives, and because it is significant for economy.
- playing computer is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 61
- Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons a 71
- Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs Which option do you prefer Use specific reasons and exam 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96256684492 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03275511569 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521390374332 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7818103251 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6842105263 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177154659219 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595630903349 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664723996142 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118002097324 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212798181458 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.