Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this current phase of civilization, humans have stopped depending on forests or wild animals for food. Mostly we generate our food from agriculture or from domesticated animals. As population increases, the requirement for basic necessities like food and shelter and industries. In addition, these endangered animals are moved to national preserve forests for their well-being is taken care by the forest department. Hence, I think human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are prioritized to saving land for endangered animals.
First of all, increase in human populations resulted in an increase in consumption of natural resources for basic human needs like shelter, food, and industries. So in order to fulfill these basic needs, there is a necessity to prioritize these compared to endangered animals. For example, in India in the year 2014, the per capita net requirement of food per year was 178.6kgs, but in the year 2017, this has increased to 189.1kgs. This shows that there is a requirement for an increase in farmlands in India. Therefore the human needs are more important than saving land for endangered species.
Secondly, taking away the land from endangered species isn't necessarily harmful to them. These animals are moved to a protected safe environment like national preserve forests, where they are daily monitored by forest officers. Even though we are taking away the land of endangered animals, we provide them another safe environment for their natural growth. Migration is an important aspect in the life of animals or humans. Hence, the lives of endangered animals are not affected, and this land can be used to build farmlands, houses, or industries.
As discussed above, I can safely come to the conclusion that building industries are safer in making sure there is a high chance of success. It's more favorable since it is the most effective way in ensuring a higher success rate and will save people from undue trouble as well as assist them to prospect future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...pulation increases, the requirement for basic necessities like food and shelter and industries. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... for an increase in farmlands in India. Therefore the human needs are more important than...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...g away the land from endangered species isnt necessarily harmful to them. These anim...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in addition, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18461538462 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79940145758 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544615384615 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7936541344 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1176470588 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272487235689 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09987811774 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110170517294 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156640950532 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074704906652 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.