some people think that internet provides us valubale informarmation
There is no shortage of opinions on whether the internet provides valuable information or makes it more confusing. In my opinion, I believe that the internet provides a lot of valuable information, which is very much useful in our day-to-day life. I think this way mainly for two reasons, which I explain in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, in order to get valuable information we should trust authentic websites. This provides us with the exact required information in lesser time; this will eventually eliminate confusion. For example, Google is one of the most trusted search engines all over the world. If we want to search regarding current weather forecasts, then google is so efficient that it will bring the most authentic and trusted sites up on the list. We can easily read and understands information regarding the weather. These trusted sites are developed by professionals and information is updated by researchers. So we can blindly trust these sites and get fulfilled our requirements. For this reason, I think the internet provides a lot of information.
Secondly, the internet provides information depth with research so that, there is no window for doubt regarding the confusion. For instance, websites like Wikipedia. On Wikipedia people adds their research findings; these findings are first evaluated by many other researchers. Moreover, if we want to learn new skills like programming, soft skills, and cooking. It will be available in a fraction of a second; this is the power of the internet. This is certainly clear to see how information is available in detail in a proper manner through the internet.
In conclusion, there is a little bit of a chance of confusion for newbies if they are not aware of accessing the internet but, if they know once how to access the proper website there is no chance of confusion in people. Considering the above two reasons, I agree with the view that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Bikramyoga | view | |
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 70 | view |
- people today spend a too much money on clothing to improve appearance 70
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 60
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company When XYZ lays off employees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating r sum s and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid off employees have benefited greatl 55
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 50
- Men and women physical structure 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... how information is available in detail in a proper manner through the internet. In conclusion,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... internet. In conclusion, there is a little bit of a chance of confusion for newbies if...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06382978723 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92809148679 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507598784195 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6484976576 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6842105263 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3157894737 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175805272992 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562141088839 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634898769673 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113646798034 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240899967658 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.