Some people trust their first impressions about a person’s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct. Other people do not judge a person’s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong. Compare these two attitudes. Which attitude do you agree with? Support your choice with specific examples.
First impression is considered to be important all over the world. Many people trust their instincts when they decide about a person's character, even though they have never met him before. It is not my case and as far as I am concerned nobody should be judged only after one meeting, due to the fact that they can be influenced by new environments or by prior circumstances. I will explain my statement, in the following essay.
To begin with, some individuals need some time to accommodate themselves in a fresh environment. New things, places, people or habits may be scary or intimidating, and consequently these may not allow to some persons to show their real face. Furthermore, the humans' survival instinct might be also a significant factor. For instance, when I enter to a building or a room, that is full with foreigners, I scan it for a few seconds, in order to reassure myself that is safe enough. Another compelling example is related to one of my best friends. Back in college, in the first day of the term, I saw a blond girl who was sitting alone, having a serious, unapproachable figure. My first impression was that her attitude was arrogant and superior, but subsequently these judgments proved to be completely wrong. We were introduced by another colleague, and soon we became best friends. In fact, she was friendly, funny, talkative and we had numerous common standpoints. It was after-wards when she confessed she was coming from a small town, and that it usually takes her a while to adapt to new people.
Secondly, the human comportment can be influenced by previous events. Somebody's mood can lead to a behavior that does not represent him. There are people who suffer from depression, loneliness or people who had unusual experiences beforehand. Some are emotional and they cannot dissimulate their emotions, and therefore this can conduct to misjudgments. For instance, when I was working, my company decided to hire a employee in my department. I remember having a very difficult time, because of the high volume of work I had to deal with. That times I was working late and I was not interacting with my fellows. Allegedly, he considered I was introverted and unsociable, supposition that was thoroughly false. Probably that's why he did not invite me to his birthday party.
To summarize, nobody should be judged by first impression, because this can be often misleading. Unknown environments and bad experiences can make people act in a manner that does not reflect their truly face.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 84
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 88
- Plants can provide food, shelter, clothing, or medicine. What is one kind of plant that is important to you or the people in your country? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 60
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 90
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...heir instincts when they decide about a persons character, even though they have never ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... show their real face. Furthermore, the humans survival instinct might be also a signi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...was working, my company decided to hire a employee in my department. I remember h...
^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ion that was thoroughly false. Probably thats why he did not invite me to his birthda...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92957746479 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97069228865 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9449480194 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.04 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177285487329 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043696672845 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566988852803 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120413829994 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440279283487 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.