Without a shadow of a doubt, academic institution administrators and policymakers
have a pivotal role in undergraduate students’ motivation. An unanswered question in this area is what type of programs universities should offer for the freshmen students in summer break. Despite the arguments asserting that enrolling some major subjects beforehand is beneficial for these students, I believe otherwise, maintaining that universities should prioritize a historic site tour for summer holidays. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my point of view through two compelling reasons.
The first exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is that visiting heritage places is an excellent opportunity for international students to understand the local culture and traditions. Due to accessing better forms of education and finding better careers, the number of students who attend university far away from family increases progressively. Accordingly, most overseas students find it laborious to deal with the language barrier and cultural misunderstanding. Therefore, colleges must arrange programs and events which help students to overcome these difficulties. Therefore, spending time in museums and old relics is a promising solution because these sites are the microcosm of the country’s culture, language, and religion.
Another motive to be mentioned is that if students attend pre-course classes, they will be exhausted and discouraged. As a high school student, you must sacrifice your leisure time and hobbies to be accepted into a reputable academic institution. If universities oblige students to sign up for some related-major courses, they will not have a chance to alleviate their frustration. Also, to understand these difficult courses thoroughly, students should study some prerequisite materials draining their energy and enthusiasm. On the other hand, a memorable travel experience lessens students’ stress and stimulates students to set new goals.
Reflecting upon the reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that benefit of entertainment programs is higher than educational programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...titution administrators and policymakers have a pivotal role in undergraduate stu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, if, so, therefore, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92556634304 4.8611393121 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27660913217 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660194174757 0.524837075471 126% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1257536602 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.066666667 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386996541476 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109749328094 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631017106184 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153724451432 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114710055198 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 10.9000537634 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.01818996416 131% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.