A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
It is essential that a teacher passes on their knowledge to students at school. Personally, I firmly believe that teachers connecting well with their students plays a key role in teaching them knowledge. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, getting on well with students improves their ability to profess the knowledge adequately to the students. If a teacher can get on well with students, they have a better chance at understanding the students’ point of view of learning and therefore teach the curriculum in a way which students can comprehend fully. An example of mine clearly illustrates this point. My homeroom teacher in high school also taught us Chinese literature. Due to most of the readings long and difficult, many of my fellow classmates were not looking forward to this course. However, she introduced us to various methods of processing the information found in the reading, helping us overcome the obstacle of misunderstanding the reading. In addition, she also provided us with interesting backstories of the authors, which helped us put ourselves in the authors’ shoes and look at the words from their point of view. This shows that connecting well with students give teachers an advantage in teaching.
Furthermore, teachers, who are the students’ support system at school, can assist and guide students more proficiently if they can connect well with their students. If a student does not trust their teacher, they are unlikely to ask for help from them in a dangerous or difficult situation. My classmate turned to my homeroom teacher I mentioned above for help when his parents were on the brink of divorce. He already had issues with sleep and fell behind in class quickly. My teacher not only checked on him frequently, but also encouraged him to talk to counselors if needed. My classmate’s mental health improved tremendously after her guidance. This example demonstrates that teachers connecting well with students indeed goes a long way when it comes to assisting students both in school and life.
In conclusion, if a teacher can relate well with students, they not only can teach knowledge more proficiently and efficiently, but also guide the students through overcoming difficulties in life. Therefore, I believe the teacher’s ability to get on well with students is equally important as their knowledge
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. To begin with, getting on well with stud...
^^
Line 2, column 511, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'classmates'.
Suggestion: classmates
...readings long and difficult, many of my fellow classmates were not looking forward to this course...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive teachers an advantage in teaching. Furthermore, teachers, who are the stude...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing students both in school and life. In conclusion, if a teacher can relate w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14795918367 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93884194228 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522959183673 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8373728044 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320832494693 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109744407751 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104097051189 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238859956544 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890804975666 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.