Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Young generations are the decides the fortune of any country. Therefore, teachers, tasked with guiding these future prospects, as well as their political stances are heavily significant in the nation's wellbeing. Personally, I believe that making these views known to their disciples would be more preferable as it will not only engage students' interest in political concerns but also encourage them to search out for more viewpoints and explore their own.
To begin with, teachers who conveys their opinion will also be able to discuss their viewpoints with students more openly. This helps learners raise their awareness towards social and political issues that may need reformation. As a result, overall concerns for these problems would increase, ensuring more positive efforts in finding a solution to them. For instance, the matter of insufficient funding in education may be raised by a teacher, which would then inrcease their students' overall interest in the subject, potentially contributing to a reformation of the national budgeting system as these scholars reach administrative posts. Moreover, being able to freely discuss their opinions helps teachers teach better. As they are more interested in several topics, their knowledge in these subjects are certainly superior. Consequently, incorporating this extensive knowledge, lectures can be more comprehensive and relate more to real world problems. Therefore, discussing these political stances more publicly in class will not only help encourage students' interest in political issues but also raise the quality of teaching substantially.
Furthermore, learning of their mentor's viewpoint will help encourage students to develop theirs. By discussing political issues, students may deepen their political knowledge, which helps them find their political perspective more easily by constantly challenging it. For instance, by learning if they agree or disagree with their teacher on environmental conservation measures, students can grasp a more subtantial understanding on environmental struggles and determine their political standpoint over the matter more accurately. In addition, students can learn how to discuss and confront other viewpoints, which can help them either reinforce their opinions or shift their perspective more accordingly, creating a flexible and adaptive mindset when approaching such generational concerns.
In conclusion, I think that letting teachers openly discuss their political viewpoint with students are more benefical as it will help either students to find interest in policital concerns and determine their standpoint more straightforwardly or teachers to create opportunities for higher-quality lectures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... stances are heavily significant in the nations wellbeing. Personally, I believe that m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93367346939 4.8611393121 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06973307328 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522959183673 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.8472510894 48.9658058833 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.375 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.625 5.45110844103 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30180378351 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112658244961 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746702551724 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214161496292 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181503506945 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 11.7677419355 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 10.9000537634 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.