Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that quality is tightly depended to accuracy, and the most important things in people view is the quality of products and services. Therefore, the rate always presents in the second position of impact for most people. Contrary, to this popular belief there are still those who argue that today’s we live in the society that everything is changing in very fast. Thus, who are not able to move a line with this high rate would not able to withstand in the successful position. I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that in the today world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
First and foremost, sometimes there is not any chance to recover or revised the mistakes. One of the best examples of this fact is related to the project of building a dam on Karag river in Iran. Several years ago a lot of privet architecture companies competed together to earn the project of built of this dam. Because of strong competition between different companies they had been trying to finish the geographic research stage and mathematical calculation of this project with the highest rate to increase their chance to win this competition. Unfortunately, now, after a huge amount of budget that the government served to build this dam, they find out that the dam built in a very salty ground and it is led to water of reservoir has been become completely salty. All of the attempts to find a solution to this problem was not successful till now.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that customers have more attention to the quality of products than the rate that new models transmit to the bazaar. For example, considering two self-phone companies, most well-known companies introduce update version of their products just one or two times each year. But some new companies to attract more customers introduce several different new models of self-phones in the same period of time. However, the quality of their products compare with products of famous companies is very weak. Obviously, most people preferred to buy iPhone till buying a Huawei phone.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convinced that accuracy and quality are more important matter than a high rate but lack of accuracy. Because sometimes the result of a lack of accuracy is not reversible and because accuracy has more long-term benefit than less accuracy and high rate.
- TPO 31 3
- TPO 32 71
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 65
- Do you agree or disagree?in the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 76
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...rvoir has been become completely salty. All of the attempts to find a solution to this pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 396, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...ies to attract more customers introduce several different new models of self-phones in the same p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 452, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t new models of self-phones in the same period of time. However, the quality of their products...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92705882353 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64807823508 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522352941176 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7300165252 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6111111111 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202085773694 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603200198026 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171273363849 0.0737576698707 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124799862413 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155818349034 0.0645574589148 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.