Education is the complicated thing, and quality improvement of education is the most vital and interest problem for the university. Various universities are making own efforts to improve the quality of education. To pay more highly salary to professor is one of them. However, In my opinion, this method is not efficiency and universities should not do this. The details of this opinion will be mentioned in the following sentence.
To begin with, professors do not have enough times to improve their teaching. Even if professors receive the high salary, it is in vain unless they obtain enough time to develop teaching skill.
They have a lot of things to do, like research, teaching and doing management of the university. They are busy even at present. For example, The professor who is chief of my laboratory is always working to research, to meeting and to teach. If he spends a lot of time to prepare for class, others will be neglected. Therefore, universities should take measures to improve the quality of education other than the professor.
Moreover, the professor is not professional about teaching. The paramount duty of the teacher is research. They are the capable person, but they have not learned about education theory. The fact that they are the professor does not always mean they are the superior teacher. Some research students are better at teaching than professors and have passion. I think that paying money to such a person is one means of improvement of quality.
Finally, if students do not have the motivation to study, it will be senseless. When trying to improve the quality of education, we tend to focus on the side of teaching and ignore the side of being taught.Nevertheless, education is mutual interaction.
Even if the quality of education is improved, it is not necessarily reflected in the result.
The environment of the taught side is also necessary to improve. Thus universities should consider improving the environment. To encourage students to use TA and to enhance the atmosphere of the study room.
Taking these materials into account, aim for improvement of educational quality in terms other than professors.
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-31- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 70
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 86
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 76
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...ing and ignore the side of being taught.Nevertheless, education is mutual interaction. Ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 66, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ught side is also necessary to improve. Thus universities should consider improving ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11235955056 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96007178914 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502808988764 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5782014829 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.8 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.24 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.12 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.53405017921 176% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170643868889 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505921376632 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575642599419 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814502160359 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469863737646 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.