TPO 3
The reading specifies that there are three reasons to doubt some paintings is painted by Rembrandt who was a famous Dutch painter. However, the professor explains that although the reasons are true, the painting still belongs to Rembrandt and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, the reading asserts that the woman painting has an inconsistent problem which cannot be done by Rembrandt since he was a detailed artist. The woman in the painting wearing a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford it. Nevertheless, the woman specifies that the painting is not inconsistent. The x-ray examination of the painting shows that the fur collar has been added to the painting to increase its value.
Second, according to the reading, the elements of light and shadow do not fit together in this painting and this error shows that it does not belong to the renowned Dutch artist. On the contrary, the lecturer contradicts the idea reasoning that the light and shadow are match since the dark fur collar mainly reflects the light. In this way, the face of the woman should be partially in shadows to be realistic. Therefore, there is no error in the painting.
Third, based on the reading, Rembrandt does not use a panel that glued several pieces of wood together. In contrast, the speaker cast doubts on this point by saying that, more woods were used to expand the size of the panel. Moreover, the wood that was used in the panel of the woman's painting was compared with another painting of Rembrandt (Self-portrait with hat) and the result presents that wood used in the panel are the same as each other and exploited from the same tree.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | Almendra | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | 57454751 | 81 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | 57454751 | 76 | view |
- Agree or disagree:extended family is less important now than it was in the past. 60
- tpo 33 71
- tpo 33 75
- Agree or disagree?Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, third, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 286.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82867132867 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47080117134 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51048951049 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1113183542 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.230769231 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.