TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is undeniable that people have a lot of discussions or meetings with other people to discuss their tasks properly. In these meetings, the teacher or the meeting leader sometimes says something wrong about the issue they are talking about. The question is whether we should point out the mistake in their words for them or just ignore it as if they haven’t made any mistakes or talk to them about the mistake later. In my opinion, I prefer to talk to the teacher or the meeting leader when the meeting is over.
Firstly, it is obvious that if I just talk with the teacher when we are alone, we won’t feel so embarrassed. Many people think that we have to correct the mistake immediately when the leader makes it because if they don’t do so, there will be an error in the final plan of the team, which leads to lower productivity of the team. Also, they think that in these meetings, people need to try their best to perfect their plans, so correcting others’ mistakes is normal. However, I think that if we point out their mistakes right away before many people, the leaders will feel more embarrassed before their team members, which makes the situation in the meetings become more awkward. Also, if we do so, the relationship between the leader and us becomes worse. Thus, I think that if we want to say something with the leaders about their mistakes, just talk to them about the mistakes after the meetings.
Secondly, some people prefer to say nothing about the mistakes the leaders make in the meetings. They think that it is unnecessary to speak out about the mistakes as they are just small mistakes. Others are afraid of the leaders and so they just disregard the mistakes. Nevertheless, I think that we need to say something about the mistakes instead of keeping them silent. When people meet face-to-face to discuss something, they expect they can make the best decision for their plans by collecting all opinions and ideas of others. If people don’t give any ideas about the issue or they realise some mistakes in others’ words but just ignore them, these meetings don’t have any help in achieving the best result for the teams. Meanwhile, when we talk about the mistakes to the leaders, the leaders will realise their mistakes. Maybe, the leaders can speak out their mistakes by themselves in the next meetings, so everyone can figure them out and discuss the task more carefully.
In conclusion, I prefer to talk to the leaders about the mistakes they make when the meeting is over. If I do so, the leaders won’t be so embarrassed before many people and still realise their mistakes, which helps maintain high productivity in the task, which other two activities can’t result in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...rmal. However, I think that if we point out their mistakes right away before many p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, talking about, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76532769556 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43081896354 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.380549682875 0.524837075471 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3657084151 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.7 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.65 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199176632394 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839060631129 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467662684422 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157227099618 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287824994421 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.