Nowadays, many of the work projects and school assignments are designed to be performed by groups of people, not individually. While some think that if members of a group communicate through e-mails will lead to a better result, others think otherwise. As far as I am concerned, I totally believe that classmates and co-workers should communicate in person, rather than by e-mail, in a project. The reasons why I believe so will be elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, people are more likely to present their ideas in person. I mean, if they have some minor or even stupid opinion about the project, they tend to discuss it in the group instead of by e-mail. Some might think that if they say something irrational in an e-mail, it will be a proof of their incompetence. Even maybe the one who gets the message does not fully understand the point. On the other hand, if they talk about their ideas in person, they can easily discuss their opinions and provide further information in case of need, to avoid any misunderstandings. Even if some ideas initially seem simple and unuseful, they can work on it together and improve it to a valuable idea.
Second, working together will provide a pleasant work environment. When people work together, usually, a great connection forms between them. People feel that they belong to the group, and everyone will try to be as effective as possible. They are more enthusiastic about the project, and this will lead to a better outcome. My personal experience illustrates this reality. A few years ago, I was working in a construction firm, and we were supposed to plan and build a big hospital. The manager formed a group of engineers for the job, and I was one of them. We had to work together all day on that project for one year. In that year, because we were always together, we became friends with each other. This connection made us really happy at work, and everyone wanted to do his or her best. We finished the job two months early, and it was so great that after that project, the firm decided to make groups for every project they were given.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I strongly believe that it is better for classmates or colleagues to work together on projects instead of communicating by e-mail. This way, they can present every idea that occurs to mind and have an excellent work environment. These will produce a better work for the project.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 52 Integrated Writing Task Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 88
- p 3
- TPO 55 Writing 1Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number 80
- TOEFL iBTTPO 53 Integrated Writing TaskMany countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, really, second, so, thus, while, i mean, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72705882353 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67425609745 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508235294118 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7626584397 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7083333333 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7083333333 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29166666667 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317036992358 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945186411669 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799212946505 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209199450296 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658086058315 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.