in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today
Whether there will be a decrease in the utilization of private vehicles in future or not has been a matter of argumentation among people for a long time. On one hand, some individuals concede that there will be more cars as a result of an increase in the manufacturing of vehicles. On the other hand, others believe that there will be fewer cars since people are eager to use other transportation machines. From my point of view, I acknowledge the latter idea in spite of the fact that the former one is more acceptable and has more aficionados. My answer to this debating question is threefold. In the following, the rationale behind my choice will be elaborated by the most outstanding solid proofs.
First of all, I concede that public transportation will be used more for the trips inside a city for the problem of parking spaces. For example, Tehran's citizens never drive their own cars to work inasmuch as there is not usually enough parking lots where they work. Notwithstaning, governments ought to finance related infrastructures more if they want to incourage they inhibitants to use public transportation. As a demonstration, there is not enough public transportation means in Kerman city, so its citizens have to use their own cars even though they want to help their city.
Secondly, as generations X,Y, and Z are growing and contributing to their cities and countries, these men and woment tend to save their planet by decreasing carbon emissions. One way of doing that is by not using their own vehicles. Conversely, "boom" generation does not care as much as these generations to this issue. Scholars have found that the use of private cars will have been decreased at least for 10% by the end of 2050.
Third, as most of the tasks are nowadays being done from out of the work places, individuals will not need cars anymore insomuch as they live in their houses more and do their chores in there. For instance, I am a professional stocck market trader, and most of the times I work in my house. Therefore, I never use a car or even buses and taxis to go to my work.
In conclusion, according to the abovementioned rationalizations and facts, I recognize that there will be a drastic decrease in car usage, in comparison with today's circumstances. The increase in public transportation as well as the tendency of new generations in saving the earth by means of decreasing their private transportation means are two main assumptions of this bone of conception. Furtheremore, most of the future jobs will be done from homes and there will not traditionally be everyday trips from houses to work places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- is buying a newly introduced technological device good or bad 90
- is it better to get news from sources with similar views to yours or from those with different views from yours 83
- TPO 20 independent agree or not successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 85
- TPO 07 integratedwood companies do not like ecological certifications for three reasons:1, people do not distinguish their advertisements2, they are more expensive than regular woods3, this business is not competitive 85
- TPO 23 independent Agree or disagree in today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Y
...ir city. Secondly, as generations X,Y, and Z are growing and contributing to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, well, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0690135947 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484444444444 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3614211282 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262259545029 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834743476043 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709868661672 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150409406475 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506236500911 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.