In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Some people might say the number of cars will be increasing for the upcoming twenty years. This is because a car is more and more affordable with its lowered price and increased people’s wages. However, I do not agree with this opinion for two reasons.
Firstly, new public transportation might be invented. When there were no subways, the only available methods to commute to schools or works were cars (i.e. private cars, buses, and taxis). At that time, due to the inefficiency of bus and the expensive fee of taxi, many people had to buy cars. However, when a subway was introduced, this trend was changed a lot. With its fast speed and cheap fee, many people started to use subways to commute, rather than their private cars. In a similar way, if new public transportation is invented, more and more people might use public transportation, reducing the number of cars in twenty years.
Secondly, many environment-friendly policies are inducing people to use public transportation, instead of their own cars. To be specific, the Korean government has been increasing the tax for driving a car and improving the public transportation systems with more efficient routes and cleaner and fancier facilities. Indeed, it has lowered the number of cars in the street, especially in big cities such as Seoul. In addition, the government is planning on several policies to enhance the citizen’s comfort in using public transportation. Thus, it shows the newly introduced policies have been reduced private car use, and it can be expected that upcoming policies will keep reducing the number of cars in twenty years.
It is debatable whether there will be more or fewer cars in twenty years. However, in my opinion, it is more reasonable to expect that it will be reduced with the reasons mentioned in this article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 81
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 70
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 476, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ommute, rather than their private cars. In a similar way, if new public transportation is invent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0099009901 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88545497397 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518151815182 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5165610061 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.875 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274768008143 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969528612913 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101147239884 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186919088271 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587263443961 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.