In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Cars are used everyday by millions of people and it seems impossible for people to drive them less in the future. But I , actually, believe that some years will pass and we will see none of them on the roads. The reasons of it are quite simple. Firstly, people care about ecology, while cars destroy it. Secondly, even if people don’t think about nature, they think about their bodies and heath. Accordingly, no cars make people move more, providing them a small cardio exercise.
To begin with, it is no secret that cars pollute the Earth, and while the humanity is interested in making our environment ecologically free, the machines would not be that much used. But there are also some alternatives in a face of public transport, which have the lower level of carbon dioxide and chemicals. I remember when the trend to use eco-friendly cars started my family decided to switch to buses instead of cars, cheering other relatives and friends doing the same thing. It’s worth mentioning that living in a small town, my family inspired a lot of people into that way of moving in the city. If we didn’t think of ecology, the surroundings we live in wouldn’t be that clean and full of health air.
Another point is that people are more and more fond of sports and exercising. However, sometimes adults do not have enough time to visit sport clubs or yoga classes, choosing a simple way of keeping fit - walking. By preferring underground, trolleybuses, buses and bikes we move all the muscles in our body without being under pressure as it usually takes not more than 30 minutes to come to the nearest station. That leads to forgetting about using cars and taxis, which is happened to my friend Ron. Young man disliked sport but walking as a way to get to some destination still keeps him healthy and inspired by the sceneries he sees everyday going to his office. Well, more and more people realize the same opportunity, which they would not get with a car.
To sum up, cars will be fewer in use than there are today as men and women understand its bad consequences for humans and nature in general. The less we use cars - the cleaner the Earth and the healthier we are.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- The passage and the lecture is about originality of Jane Austens full length portrait The author of the article shows 3 evidence of it but the speaker convinces that they can be hardly proved 76
- The passage states that R Robustus was a scavenger yet the professor says that it was a hunter 3
- The table gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted whereas others feel it is a medical necessity Discuss both views and state your own opinion 78
- The graph show average CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to drive them less in the future. But I , actually, believe that some years will ...
^^
Line 8, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ature in general. The less we use cars - the cleaner the Earth and the healthier ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, in general, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66062176166 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46215062186 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582901554404 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6038896433 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6842105263 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250926465217 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681252279308 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874698257266 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171221233188 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115491976595 0.0645574589148 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.