uestion:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The teacher has a tremendous impact on our lives and well-being. They enhance our success endlessly because they encompass our core. Therefore, I adamantly agree that the teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom because the instructor's point of view affected on students' thought and education.
First of all, the professor point of view has a crucial effect on the students' mind. The matter of fact, the students, consider their teacher their idols, so any behavior or idea from their teacher might affect them. For instance, if the teacher tries to share his opinion regarding his religion or regarding his beliefs about politics, these points of view might influence dramatically on young people thought because they will blindly try to follow these ideas because they think these views are the best. Besides, if the new generation tries to imitate their teacher thought, this might create negative consequences with their parents because the parents might argue with their children about these concepts which, in turn, affect dramatically on the relationship between the parents and their offspring. Hence, the teacher should not share their idea and concept with their students.
Second, the main function of the teacher in the school is to learn the students the academic lessons. Indeed, the students are attending school to improve their education, not to see the teacher points of view. However, if the instructor spends ample time trying to show his thought, this strategy might impact profoundly on the young people education. The teacher should squander his time in the school to improve the knowledge acquisition of the students, and he should try to boos the curriculum to enhance the students' academic information, so, if the teacher spends the time for sharing his opinion, this thing might push the students away from the essential thing. Also, sharing teacher views also influence teacher life because he will lose his private life. As you can see, the instructor should be aware of not sharing their views.
For the reasons mentioned above, from my perspective, the teacher should not make their social and political views. Not only they affect the student thought but also they hurt their education. Hopefully, all instructors reassess their priority to improve the populace.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 62
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 64
- TOEFL TPO 20 - Integrated Writing Task 67
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 59
Comments
Essay evaluation report
because the instructor's point of view affected on students' thought and education.
because the instructor's point of view will affect students' thoughts and education.
is to learn the students the academic lessons.
is to teach the students the academic lessons.
Not only they affect the student thought but also they hurt their education. Hopefully, all instructors reassess their priority to improve the populace.
Description: don't use 'not only..not...'. You can use 'neither...nor' or 'either...or'
-----------------------------
flaws:
1. No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2 //read a good grammar book
2. No. of Different Words: 169 200 //a lot of duplicated words
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 19 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 377 350
No. of Characters: 1924 1500
No. of Different Words: 169 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.406 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.103 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.426 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 145 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.176 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.192 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.354 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.53 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.155 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...e instructors point of view affected on students thought and education. First of all,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'boo'.
Suggestion: boo
...n of the students, and he should try to boos the curriculum to enhance the students ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24668435013 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50071438969 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466843501326 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.0120686667 48.9658058833 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.352941176 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265479743037 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103629420536 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874452880859 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18783170372 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349661330959 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.