Without a shadow of a doubt, academic institution administrators and policymakers
have a pivotal role in undergraduate students’ development. An unanswered question in this area is what type of programs universities should offer for the freshmen students in summer break. Despite the arguments asserting that enrolling some major subjects beforehand is beneficial for these students, I believe otherwise, maintaining that universities should prioritize a historic site tour for summer holidays. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my point of view through two compelling reasons.
The first exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is that visiting heritage places is an excellent opportunity for international students to understand the local culture and traditions. Due to accessing better forms of education and finding better careers, the number of students who attend university far away from family increases progressively. Accordingly, most overseas students find it laborious to deal with the language barrier and cultural misunderstanding. Therefore, colleges must arrange programs and events which help students to overcome these difficulties. Spending time in museums and old relics is a promising solution because these sites are the microcosm of the country’s culture, language, and religion. For instance, if not for my university’s tour programs before the academic year, my abroad classmate could not have comprehended Iran’s community.
Another motive to be mentioned is that if students attend pre-course classes, they will be exhausted and discouraged. As a high school student, you must sacrifice your leisure time and hobbies to be accepted into a reputable academic institution. If universities oblige students to sign up for some related-major courses, they will not have a chance to alleviate their frustration. Also, to understand these difficult courses thoroughly, students should study some prerequisite materials draining their energy and enthusiasm. On the other hand, a memorable travel experience lessens students’ stress and stimulates them to set new goals. One survey was conducted in my country for this dilemma and confirmed this.
Reflecting upon the reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that benefit of entertainment programs is higher than educational programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...titution administrators and policymakers have a pivotal role in undergraduate stu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87172011662 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26130794373 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6472303207 0.524837075471 123% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.680848399 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.470588235 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369369275505 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100714770966 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06197319268 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153180012808 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111807861772 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 10.9000537634 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.01818996416 129% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.