When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree?
People often attribute success to a calculated and sustained level of hard work. It is a common parlance that if you put in the time, you will reap the rewards. However, this is not often the case, some level of luck is needed for success. I have these two reasons to support my claim.
First of all, success does not usually favor the determined and committed at most times because it complicates the simple. Hard work brings a formulaic approach to making it in life. During my preparation for the Graduate Record exams, I put in a lot of hard work into my preparation but it did count for nothing in the end. Perharps, if I had carefully rode my luck, I would have done better. With my hard work, I felt highly prepared and confident for the exam. Quite a number of people not adequately prepared like I was did far better than I did. Simply put, luck came their way. It is indeed a clear proof that when we work so hard, it complicates life for us. we often do not take our time to rest and analyze our steps. we are culpable of putting in too much time for the work which probably leads to complications.
Secondly, it is true that most scientific innovations today are products of mere luck. Quite a significant number of innovators can attest to the luck as one of the gifts of nature. In the discovery of penicilim by Flemming, luck was primarily in play. Contrary to what he was testing for in the laboratory, he came about these useful microbes that were highly beneficial for health treatment. Today, more funds are being poured into different researches but as history has clearly shown, the next breakthrough would probably come from sheer luck. It is vivid that even the most funded projects with enough resources do not yield the expected outcomes. This is why most scientists examine the concept of probabilities in most of their experiments. If luck was not an important denominator, the probabilistic fields would not have been a huge success today. In fact, it is not so possible to measure hard work like the way probability has been expounded in scientific fields.
Conclusively, while it is true that putting in the work is instrumental to success, the place of luck cannot be questioned. these uncertainties are very vital in almost all the things of life. It is luck that can make the most sidelined parameter become a huge success. Only luck can make the inconsequential more important.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-03 | joyce05 | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | toeflman | 76 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | wxr031 | 70 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | SubCulturo | 60 | view |
| 2021-09-09 | nida fatima | 66 | view |
- However in the lecture the man disagree with this develpoment and provides three reasons to refutes each of the reading reason 60
- No one can deny that there are negative and positive aspect of comparing the comfortability of life in the olden days to the nowadays life If i were to choose i would definitely agree that it is more comfortable to live now than the time of our grandparen 73
- The article states that the online encylopedia is not perfect compare to traditional encyclopedia and the reading provides three reasons of support However the Professor in the lecture claims that the onlone encylopedia is more perfect than the traditiona 66
- People who make decisions based on emotions and justify them with logic are often poor decision makers 54
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'ridden'.
Suggestion: ridden
...n the end. Perharps, if I had carefully rode my luck, I would have done better. With...
^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...ople not adequately prepared like I was did far better than I did. Simply put, luck...
^^^
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...our time to rest and analyze our steps. we are culpable of putting in too much tim...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...the place of luck cannot be questioned. these uncertainties are very vital in almost ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66978922717 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71787300858 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538641686183 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4597444526 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.8518518519 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8148148148 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269598211529 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664225975622 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045672407092 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158159137535 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380364694641 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.