Which one do you think is preferable: shopping at a big store or several small stores? Use reasons and specific examples to support our answer?

Essay topics:

Which one do you think is preferable: shopping at a big store or several small stores? Use reasons and specific examples to support our answer?

Since the dawn of humanity, human beings have had the most challenges with the environment and also they have had the most changes with respect to the other creatures thanks to the power of brain, thought. These changes lead to having wide varieties of needs; and, store materials is no exception. While there is a heated controversy whether we buy at small stores or big ones, I, personally, believe that buying at big stores is more preferred. For doing so, I have some reasons which I elaborate upon them in the following.
The first privilege of buying at hypermarkets has to do with saving the time and money. As in a well-known proverb, “time is money,”; asserts time has worth equal to money. Though, I believe that time has worth more than money, because you can never find the lost time again, while you can find the lost money by hardworking and perseverance; and, without any shadow of a doubt, time is the most precious present which we were given in the whole life. Consequently, the best advantage of big stores is saving time which we could enjoy that in a decent manner. Moreover, by shopping in just one place, we have implicitly solved many other problems, such as traffic, decreasing air pollutants, to name but a handful. These are just some results of parking in place and finding all what we want in just one store. As an example, I remember the time that I and my wife were looking for a toothbrush for about half an hour; because there is not any hypermarket around us.
As I have seen in the recent years, supermarkets are more responsible for the types of product they sell to their consumers. These stores have some specific clerks to just deal with the assessement of their consumers’ satisfication and this is a missing part in small stores. By getting the consumers opinions about different products, they not only improve their quality and may quantity of their products, but giving their consumers more satisfication which leads to having more consumers during the time; just “one stone killing two birds”.
In summary, with all and many other reasons taken into account, I incline to the idea of buying what we need in big stores on the grounds that there are wide varieties of products which would bring us a present, which I named time-money present, and also we can have more suggestions and complains by being in contact with the specific person who they provided to answer their consumers.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-04 zavarehb 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user zavarehb :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... well-known proverb, 'time is money,'; asserts time has worth equal to money...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 550, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a decent manner" with adverb for "decent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s saving time which we could enjoy that in a decent manner. Moreover, by shopping in just one plac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey provided to answer their consumers.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, while, as to, in summary, such as, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79716981132 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67022381639 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518867924528 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.8981308812 48.9658058833 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.6 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2666666667 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187594314807 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710054510691 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643638295934 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120539081481 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463918388969 0.0645574589148 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.