Agree or Disagree: Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.

Essay topics:

Agree or Disagree: Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.

Since the dawn of humanity, the power of the brain, thought, which has distinguished us from other creatures has caused great changes in the whole world, and lifestyle is no exception. Humans know that as a proverb “time is money,” states, there is no need to experience anything from the beginning without earlier knowledge, because some of us have passed some experiences and gained some knowledge through that; the way we can transfer the knowledge to the others is through “education”. While there is a heated controversy whether parents, nowadays, have more roles in the education of their children, I, personally, believe that this is true on the grounds that it is a necessity, and today’s jobs are more specifically which requires extensive education.
Nowadays, with the galloping rate at which technology is flourishing has made a wide variety of fields to fulfill the human’s needs; so, every field should be full of information to prepare the children and the young for the near future. In today’s hectic city life, parents should pay more attention with respect the ancient times in order to have decent children to be prepared for doing their best in the country specifically, and in the world generally. As another point of view, it is children’s basic right to learn some needed information in a peaceful place, so-called family, and this will not be possible except by incessant cooperation of parents to provide such a decent place. They could provide the best possible schools, amusements, state-of-the-art educational movies, medical care, to name quite a few.
Without any shadow of doubt, today’s jobs need much knowledge to do them appropriately, so a huge amount of information will discourage any children and young unless a decent environment has been provided. In this case, if families do not support their children they would go through a very undesired way which makes them law-abided, leads to juvenile delinquency, and disobedient ones will be resulted; in contrast to the other way which makes them docile, well-manner, and a productive person for their selves, and the society in general. Also, some children may find their interests by being involved with the toys, and other recreational facilities; who could provide such a massive range of accessories except some considerate parents?
In summary, with all and many other reasons are taken into account, I do believe that families are responsible for providing any possible facilities, and a healthy mental place, and a supportive place, to name but a handful, for their children to flourish their interests and abilities in a decent manner.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-19 shayanhgh 73 view
2020-01-05 naziii 76 view
2019-12-27 0386 90 view
2019-12-17 nusybah 73 view
2019-11-05 Aylahh 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user zavarehb :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ow that as a proverb 'time is money,' states, there is no need to experience...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a decent manner" with adverb for "decent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... flourish their interests and abilities in a decent manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, while, in contrast, in general, in summary, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26168224299 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08702779202 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553738317757 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.1344086022 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9597661246 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 204.727272727 100.406767564 204% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 38.9090909091 20.6045352989 189% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174405175325 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725777797035 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579937144073 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10547011474 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319798579297 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 11.7677419355 194% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.1575268817 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.0537634409 171% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 10.247311828 224% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.