Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Workers are the most important part of offices, company and in a general view, the industry. All the administrators of the companies try to care about the efficiency of the workers' functionality. So it is a challenging problem that how should the tasks be assigned among the workers. I believe that it is better to assign similar tasks to the workers due to two reasons that are being explained below.
First, I think that assigning similar tasks to one worker makes him/her more professional in his/her major. Because when workers do similar tasks, they just concentrate on the particular conception related to their tasks. For example, an electrical engineer with a communication tendency has to focus on his/her field. This focus consists of achieving more knowledge about the conceptions of his/her major and learning more about the most beneficial application used in the communication systems. Nevertheless, he/she approaches to be a sophisticated electrical engineer in his/her career.
Secondly, I honestly believe that doing similar tasks is much easier than do the various tasks for the workers. Workers want to have a more comfortable expert life; therefore, they want that this way as a paved way. For instance, if an assistant in a factory just concentrates on his/her task, he/she can perform his/her task much better and with quality. On the other hand, imagine a worker that has to do multiple tasks. Obviously, this worker will be confused with these various tasks and requisitive knowledge. In addition, she/he has to learn much more knowledge than before. So it may cause unsatisfaction with his/her job position.
All in all, in my opinion, there are much more advantages in the similarity of the tasks rather than the variety of them. one of my reasons is that concentrating on a single area of tasks make the workers more expert so they can be much more certain about their brilliant future. On the other hand, focusing on similar tasks avoids the workers to confuse about various required knowledge and tasks which are had to be done until a certain time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Question Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...try to care about the efficiency of the workers functionality. So it is a challenging p...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... tasks rather than the variety of them. one of my reasons is that concentrating on ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, honestly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05217391304 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84472339002 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492753623188 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7918263333 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7368421053 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1578947368 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283465481512 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938648799193 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681097785173 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181601105604 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459176493062 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.