Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
To live life man needs to work in an office or organization. No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of different tasks and similar tasks. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely say that workers would be happier when they have different types of works than doing similar works again and again. It is my firm belief that people want diversity in their work-life for a number of reasons, and so I will develop these ideas in the next subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, diversity can bring rid of boringness in a workplace. People are easily getting bored doing something the same again and again. They want some variables in their tasks and find this variety gives them more concentration and activeness to do work. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. You see, after graduating I got a job in a multinational design company. In this company, sometimes, I have to check the same design all day long, and it really makes me bore. When I get some projects to check different designs, I really enjoy the diversity of the designs. As a result, It makes me more concentrated and active. For this reason, I want more diversified tasks on my desk.
Secondly, diversity in a job can increase employee's skill at different tasks and it helps to get promotion as well as more salary. Drawing from my own experience, my friend is a lecturer in a university, he takes several classes such as computer programming courses, mechanical engineering courses, etc. By teaching all these courses, now my friend is a good programmer and has a good mechanical engineering background. Moreover, many students are enrolled every semester to do his courses and the university has decided to make him a permanent teacher that will have a high salary. It is certainly clear to see, diversity in a job can make someone more skillful and help to get more money.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long because of to get rid of boringness and get more money.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 85
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT
Message: Use simply 'many'.
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, well, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73575129534 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76934159429 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3157344197 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2105263158 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358390442097 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929748449818 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135189601983 0.0737576698707 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265208606145 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197505574748 0.0645574589148 306% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.