Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Generally there are two types of work: one contains tasks in various field, while another only require people to focus on the same thing. Some argue that the former is better since it may allow people to explore more posibility about their ability. However, considering the effectiveness and the work-life balance, I believe more people would prefer the latter.
First of all, focusing on the similar tasks would be helpful to improve one's effectiveness. Our humans are required some period of time to learn and remember new staffs, especially when one first to handle challanges. Therefore, it is inpreventive for people to make mistakes in their first try. The result is the decline of performance, or even productivity. An appropriate example is not very far to seek. For instance, when I was a student, I had to switch among different subjects during my classday. However, what really happened is that I easily forgot what I have learned just minutes ago, thus greatly declined my grade. After few years, I found that I could only concertrate on one subject each time, and this really helpful since I could put myself into the world of that subject, and was not perturbed by surroudings. It gave me more confidence that I definitely able to remember the new knowledge. Therefore, I got a huge improvement since then.
Moreover, handling with similar taks would contribuate to a work-life balance. This is because one can wield his previous knowledge to deal with a similar work, and reduce the time that one needed to familiar with the new task. If workers could finish his daily tasks quickly, he can earlier to go home and would have longer period to accompancy with his family. In addition, suppose one is really ensuiastic in learning new knowledge to fulfill his curiosity, the fallow time after working is more suitable for this task. Because he at that period would perform in a mood, instead of a annoy mood when one is just working.
To sum up, doing the same thing during the working time would reduce the potential mistakes, improve the effectiveness, and provide a better work-life balance. Therefore, this would consider as a better choice for most people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...milar tasks would be helpful to improve ones effectiveness. Our humans are required ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ctiveness. Our humans are required some period of time to learn and remember new staffs, espec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use he at that period would perform in a mood, instead of a annoy mood when one i...
^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...od would perform in a mood, instead of a annoy mood when one is just working. ...
^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...od would perform in a mood, instead of a annoy mood when one is just working. To su...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9375 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66992096615 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557065217391 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6792137019 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.85 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147497359317 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04122588032 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377391931294 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821572335748 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237419449522 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.